Since the Etymology of pandoc 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/pandoc-discuss/etymology%7Csort:relevance/pandoc-discuss/GGu5JBrav9s/j1MlumQUAQAJ> 
is mixed, and the fact that [image: \forall] is not really of any 
Etymological origin, I think the [image: \Delta] is ok as long as it kind 
of convey the meaning. The [image: \forall \Delta] thing gives me a picture 
of this: [image: \forall \delta_i, \delta_j \in \Delta, \text{pandoc}_{ij}: 
\delta_i \rightarrow \delta_j]

By the way, looking at the PDF, it seems it is not difficult to find one 
that both [image: \forall] and [image: \Delta] are at the same angle.

But then on 2nd thought, [image: \forall] and [image: \Delta] has very 
simple strokes, so make be using shape not type is better.

On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 7:05:18 AM UTC-8, BP Jonsson wrote:

Den 2016-12-08 kl. 15:23, skrev Kolen Cheung: 
> > since both "letters" are of different languages, probably only math font 
> has both 
>
> Not so. Attached are some examples of fonts on my system which 
> have both. You need to look at fonts which cater to linguist types. 
>
> I can't help pointing out, though, that the Greek word for 
> 'document', ἔγγραπτος, doesn't start with a Δ, so perhaps a 
> ligature of Ɐ and a Latin D would be more appropriate. 
>
> /bpj 
>
>
> ​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/844cf7bd-c9f1-49e0-a1fd-81a827c9c667%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.