It seems to me from googling that pandoc-crossref is good for cross-references in markdown. Would you consider pandoc-crossref to be added ? Or would you consider pandoc-fignos better for the task ?

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 4:44:34 AM UTC+8, John MacFarlane wrote:

I've sometimes thought of including pandoc-fignos, just as
we now include pandoc-citeproc.  That might be a good move
until we have better native reference handling.

+++ Alexandre Bergel [Mar 03 18 09:11 ]:
>   Hi!
>   I spent a few hours looking for a better way to make references in
>   Pandoc. Why the pandoc-fignos filter is not part of the default pandoc
>   distribution? I was really about to stop using pandoc because of the
>   poor handling of references.
>   I guess there is a pretty good reason why not doing so... which is?
>   Cheers,
>   Alexandre
>
>   --
>   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>   Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>   an email to [1]pandoc-discus...@googlegroups.com.
>   To post to this group, send email to
>   [2]pandoc-...@googlegroups.com.
>   To view this discussion on the web visit
>   [3]https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/7a642901-09bd-4fd4-
>   b529-568d79d17b7b%40googlegroups.com.
>   For more options, visit [4]https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>References
>
>   1. mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
>   2. mailto:pandoc-...@googlegroups.com
>   3. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/7a642901-09bd-4fd4-b529-568d79d17b7b@googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>   4. https://groups.google.com/d/optout