I've run into another curious issue (Pandoc 2.18). 

The CSL-style I use has a label for locators ("at p.#" or "at pp. ##-##"). 
However, if the page numbers are in *Roman* numerals, the label does not 
appear as it does with Arabic numerals. 

The attached test .md file has two references and cites them with a page 
number, one Arabic, one Roman. The results in the footnotes: 

[image: locator-differences.png]
I have tried it with another CSL file that also uses p./pp. and the results 
are the same. 

Any idea what's going on? Is this related to the other locator issue I 
raised with citeproc?: 
https://github.com/jgm/citeproc/issues/107#issuecomment-1140252757

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/86c967e3-7933-42f5-b33b-f3a8764283ban%40googlegroups.com.