On Friday, 9 June 2017 15:31:05 UTC+8, marc chantreux wrote:
> https://heerdebeer.org/Software/markdown/pandocomatic/

is there a gain switching from make to pandocomatic ?

I personally prefer that with Pandocomatic (or Panzer), I use simple YAML metadata for templating. The syntax is clearly focussed on Pandoc so it is very close/identical to the Pandoc command-line settings/metadata. I like tools which are made for the job, and that have a very clearly specified interface (pre/postprocessors etc). 

For people who have never used make, then it is *much* easier to explain YAML metadata to them.

But if you look at something like Pandoc-Scholar[1], then you see an elegant makefile useable by non-experts can do what these specialised tools can do, and though the makefile is more verbose perhaps than pandocomatic, it is bound to be more flexible.

Ian

[1] https://pandoc-scholar.github.io

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/86d3ff10-0fa6-4221-bac6-fd931e8a1434%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.