Re: Auto-number list continuations

[Albert Krewinkel <albert+pandoc-9EawChwDxG8hFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org>]

BPJ <melroch-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Den mån 28 nov. 2022 13:10Albert Krewinkel <albert+pandoc@zeitkraut.de> skrev:
>
>> Just want to share a little filter that I wrote to automate item
>> counting in continued lists. E.g.
>
> I would have expected that you would need `topdown=true` for this to
> work. Why not?

Funny, I expected that too. I guess the answer is that the default
traversal order is sufficient because nodes at the same level are
processed sequentially either way. Also, nested lists of the same style
will lead to weird behavior with both methods, just in slightly
different circumstances:

``` markdown
1. Bad results with default traversal

<!-- -->

99. Should be numbered as 2.

   1. one
   2. two
```

and

``` markdown
1. Bad results with `traverse='topdown'`

    1. one
    2. two

<!-- -->

99. Should be numbered as 2.
```

-- 
Albert Krewinkel
GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe  e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/87cz96nryb.fsf%40zeitkraut.de.