Thank you for your help! I tried removing the pandoc-latex-environment 
arguments in the YAML but still it does not get the environment, it just 
reproduces the text inside it. Are you suggesting that I can format a 
reference docx such that the syntax

::: {.definition}

My definition.

:::

is processed by pandoc as a "Definition" environment?


On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 00:36:10 UTC+10 Paul Kelleher wrote:

> Oops, except: I'm not sure how best to handle the desired {.definition} 
> environment when converting to docx. I suspect you'll have to set up a 
> style in a reference docx file. Look for "--reference-doc=" here 
> <https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#options-affecting-specific-writers> for 
> more about that. 
>
> On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 9:33:19 AM UTC-5 Paul Kelleher wrote:
>
>> Omit the "pandoc-latex-environment" arguments in the YAML and I think the 
>> conversion to docx should work just fine. For cross-referencing equations I 
>> highly recommend the pandoc-crossref filter. 
>>
>> On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 9:20:31 AM UTC-5 Christophe Demko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm the creator of the pandoc-latex-environment. This filter is for 
>>> pdf output using LaTeX (or beamer). For docx, you have to use another way.
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 4 août 2023 à 13:34:46 UTC+2, Enrico Mattia Salonia a écrit :
>>>
>>>> When converting markdown to docx latex environments disappear and only 
>>>> the text inside them is retained. Conversion from markdown to pdf works 
>>>> fine.
>>>>
>>>> I am using --filter pandoc-latex-environment. The following is an 
>>>> extract of the .md
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> title: Hi
>>>> author: Brover
>>>> pandoc-latex-environment:
>>>>   df: [definition]
>>>>   prop: [proposition]
>>>>   proof: [proof]
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> ::: {.definition}
>>>>
>>>> A profile of actions $a \in A$ constitute a **Nash Equilibrium** if
>>>>
>>>> $$u_i \left( r_i \left(a_i, a_{-i} \right) \right) \geq u_i \left( r_i 
>>>> \left(a^{\prime}_i, a_{-i} \right) \right)$$
>>>>
>>>> for all agents $i \in N$ and actions $a_i, a_i^{\prime} \in A_i$.
>>>>
>>>> :::
>>>>
>>>> Should I use a different syntax or the filter is not enough?
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/89746b58-348c-408b-9c06-37074cad444an%40googlegroups.com.