On Monday, August 24, 2020 at 7:51:17 PM UTC+2 DSt...-Jdbf3xiKgS8@public.gmane.org wrote:

On 8/23/20 7:54 AM, Albert Krewinkel wrote:
> Looks great, IMHO! The produced layout is beautiful, and
> supporting more variables is nice, too.
>
> The only concern I have is that this could open pandora's box when
> is comes to requests for CSS tweaks. But this seems like a minor
> problem.

It's also worth considering that not all HTML output is fed to a
browser. I've used Pandoc to feed to local previews, or to sites that
can ingest HTML and work with it. It's probably embedded into some
pipelines someplace as well.

I appreciate the thought on this, but I'm not sure it's something we
want on by default - and it's also something that can be implemented
fairly easily by the user editing their default template.

Daniel T. Staal

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------