+++ hgv [Sep 26 14 14:43 ]:
>A larger solution might be in giving up the ability of pandoc-citeproc to
>produce either inline citations or note citations. I understand how useful
>this is, but if it doesn't actually work for one side of it (notes), I
>don't see the value. Of course, I only work with Chicago note-bibliography,
>which is where my bias comes from. But it seems to be designed primarily
>for those who work with Chicago author-date (and other inline styles), not
>really those who use both extensively. But as I'm sure this would entail a
>fair amount of work to just get back to where it is now, I understand the
>downsides.

The question is this:  in footnote styles, how SHOULD a citation that
appears inside a note be formatted?  Clearly not as a footnote, but
unfortunately beyond that the style won't give us guidance.  Should
it be a separate sentence?  In parentheses?  In brackets?  These are
all stylistic variations, but the style can't help us here because
it's a note style.

If this question could be answered, perhaps progress could be made.