To add: I've tested this both with converting the .org to PDF and to Markdown, and in both instances pandoc seems to misinterpret (or neglect) the end of the footnote. On Saturday, 7 October 2017 16:49:52 UTC+2, Elias S wrote: > > Hi > > I've been using pandoc for markdown, and recently started writing my texts > in Org. I ran into an issue concerning footnotes. > > According to the Org Manual , a > footnote definition ends after two consecutive empty lines. Pandoc doesn't > seem to respect this. > > For example, when I write: > > Paragraph. Some text.[fn:some_note] > > [fn:some_note] Footnote text goes here. > > > Second paragraph. > > > pandoc includes 'second paragraph' in the footnote. > > When exporting with the included Org exporting function, the result is as > expected: the second paragraph is not included in the footnote. > > I am guessing this is a bug. Or am I missing something? > > Since I am a new and rather inexperienced user, I thought I'd post it here > before submitting it as a bug. > > Kind regards > Elias > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/9b2cba4d-3217-4b8a-be3b-ba4c9d0dc946%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.