I haven't made the repository public yet, but would be happy to share a subset -- is there anything in particular you're interested in, or just general interest in citation filtering? On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:14 AM wrote: > I don’t have a particular suggestion for what you need, but I might be > interested in what you already do. could you perhaps share your filters ? > > > > Best, > Denis > > > > *Von:* pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org *Im > Auftrag von *Shane Liesegang > *Gesendet:* Montag, 30. Mai 2022 09:07 > *An:* pandoc-discuss > *Betreff:* Separating multiple citations in generated footnote > > > > My institution has a few specific citation style requirements that stray > from the standard Chicago Style. The changes are mostly around specific > works, so it's difficult-to-impossible to meet the requirements by making a > new CSL. > > For the most part I'm able to handle it with Lua filters. I intercept the > citation reference both before and after --citeproc runs and make whatever > changes I need to; this might entail changing the style to SuppressAuthor, > making some capitalization/punctuation changes, etc. In general this works > well, but where it gets difficult is if a single Cite element contains > multiple citations. In that case, looking at the generated footnote, > there's no hard indicator of which portion came from which citation. I've > got something working based on scanning for semicolons, but I worry that's > a little bit fragile and will probably break on certain sets of reference > data. > > Is there any good way of mapping portions of the footnote to citation > keys? I was thinking to wrap them in a span with some custom metadata, but > I can only see the citations either before --citeproc (when the footnote > doesn't exist yet) or after (when the multiple citations have already > combined). What would be truly ideal would be the ability to filter the > citation process itself, but I'm assuming since that's from a different > library that it is not exposed to Lua? > > Like I said, I have something mostly working now, but any thoughts/advice > would be appreciated. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pandoc-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/baf8fe27-c662-4825-981d-b49fb7b38d71n%40googlegroups.com > > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pandoc-discuss/uIe_wOxcGUs/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/8ed092b504f248fa984c4284113f68ff%40unibe.ch > > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAD7-qeusumC9zcpbCGbjevJ6J9Vdi4W8YJyTjiTmbR_yk5%2Bmrg%40mail.gmail.com.