Lots of companies and projects have logos that are not used as a letter in
spelling out the company name. That is perfectly fine in my opinion. Better to
have something which is graphically recognizable.
In that vein, I think perhaps a diamond-shape or even better, 45 degree rotated
square, a bit like the old TextWrangler one, would be a good background, it
could make it clear this was not just an oddly formatted pilcrow/paragraph sign
but that this is in fact on purpose. I would also suggest that the filled-in
pilcrow on such a background, whether reversed or not, might be a better logo
then than an unfilled one, because it is less likely to be mistaken as part of
the actual product name and more likely to be seen as an image or symbol.
That being said, I agree that done is better than perfect.
On 02/01/20 10:48, allefeld wrote:
> Agreed, using the reversed pilcrow as a letter P is not a good idea.
>
> For the moment I would propose that we just settle on a font so we have
> *something* for a logo.
>
> Beyond that, someone with at least some graphic design skills would be
> needed.
>
> For me, the motivation was that I needed something to put on a button in an
> Atom package I'm developing, see attached.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 2, 2020 at 10:19:40 AM UTC, mb21 wrote:
> >
> > I find the pilcrows don’t work very well when used to write Pandoc without
> > some further graphical editing. It just shows that it’s not the letter P of
> > that font. If we’d want to use the pilcrow as part of a wordmark, some
> > qualified person will probably need to do some designing.
> >
> > Speaking of which, the pandoc website could probably also use a graphical
> > update. Not saying the current state of things is bad, but if we are going
> > to have an official logo, might as well do it properly, with something
> > resembling a visual identify to go along with. Nothing fancy, but something
> > consistent and with proper spacing etc. that’s less historically grown than
> > the current website.
> >
> > P.S. I know open source projects are known to struggle with design work
> > (probably because it requires skills so different to programming? I don't
> > know...) As a commandline-tool/library, pandoc so far didn't have the need
> > for it at all...
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pandoc-discuss/1bKIuyBnWaQ/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/c3dcb843-c8c9-4ea1-8dcc-7cd742f8f746%40googlegroups.com.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thøger Emil Rivera-Thorsen Post: AlbaNova Universitetscentrum
Astrophysicist, Postdoctoral fellow SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Astronomy, Oskar Klein Center E-Mail: trive-1s38ZZnEJkowFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org
Stockholm University Mobile phone: +46 (0)737 703 603
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/20200103120238.y6ob3i52lpzkyxtb%40syenite.