If you mean the font I used it's Noto Serif.

/bpj

Den mån 9 dec. 2019 20:58John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> skrev:

Well, I like the simple reversed pilcrows best, I think (without the 'd').

I can't decide which one I like best, but I'm starting to like
this more slender version better than the font awesome one,
especially in a box as in your example.
(Which font was that?)

Benct Philip Jonsson <melroch-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> I forgot two of the attachments.  Here they are.
>
> On 2019-12-05 14:19, BPJ wrote:
>> I like the reversed pilcrow a lot!
>>
>> To me it also suggests that Pandoc is ~~subverting~~ reversing the hegemony
>> of WYSIWYG "word processors" which I hate with a gusto! :-)
>>
>> My two (three) worthless coins:
>>
>> 1.  I think the idea that you can use the (reversed) pilcrow from any font
>> is an important one.
>>
>> 2.  Any graphics editor worth its salt (including LaTeX's *graphicx*
>> package!) should AFAIK be able to flip a text box/object so that you can
>> reverse the ordinary pilcrow from any font on the fly. I know for a fact
>> that Inkscape can, which is perhaps the most important as it is free and
>> open source, since I have flipped and rotated text objects containing
>> various Unicode arrows in it not too long ago.
>>
>>
>> 3.  Perhaps the logo should be a black/dark square with a white/light
>> reverse pilcrow, similar to the [M↓] logo for Markdown used e.g. on Stack
>> Exchange. I'm thinking that it looks more like a logo that way. At least it
>> should be a sanctioned variant, as should [⁋] — a reverse pilcrow in square
>> brackets, to make it stand out better.
>>
>> Den tors 5 dec. 2019 04:31Kolen Cheung <christian.kolen@gmail.com> skrev:
>>
>>> For this one, may be moving the d diagonally (lower left) a bit such that
>>> those straight lines line on a square?
>>>
>>> On the other hand, after @jgm said it, ⁋ does look like ΠD, short form of
>>> PanDoc (ΠᾰνDoc), also has a meaning of "all documents." So may be it can be
>>> viewed as the D already embedded in ⁋ and no need to repeat that.
>>>
>>> Does any other feel also that the D should have a hole in it?
>>>
>>> P.S. haven't seen Π used as ∀. Which field?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, December 4, 2019 at 11:54:20 AM UTC-8, allefeld wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, maybe the trimming was a bit too much. How about leaving a serif:
>>>>
>>>> [image: ReversedPilcrowDoubleFlippedTrimmedSerif.svg.png]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "pandoc-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a28791eb-2ff1-4cf0-854f-28dc476dd523%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a28791eb-2ff1-4cf0-854f-28dc476dd523%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d8e2a245-57b6-148d-971f-5ac0c0d295fd%40gmail.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CADAJKhBRvGtaXdR9cm_SXFVHn0dibw8VyvwPb4j1wrjinDt3tA%40mail.gmail.com.