(Changing the subject to keep better organized.)

I think I'd prefer just requiring --citeproc for citation
processing,

rather than making it automatic and providing
a --no-citeproc escape.  It's just conceptually simpler, and
I think people might find it confusing that they can omit
--citeproc, but it's not irrelevant, since it matters where
it is placed.

To allow --citeproc to be inserted at an arbitrary
position in a sequence of filters, we'd
have to add a new constructor for Filter, CiteprocFilter.
Then we could just add the transformation to applyFilters
(in T.P.Filter).

It would also be good to add a deprecation warning
for people who continue to use `--filter pandoc-citeproc`,
suggesting that they use `--citeproc` instead.
(This will still work, for the moment, but I don't plan
to keep maintaining pandoc-citeproc after the new lib
is published.)

Currently the pandoc-citeproc filter is implicitly
used when someone specifies --bibliography on the command
line.  That's a legacy feature going way back, which
I'd planned to phase out.  So maybe this is the time to
do so.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m21rj8jge2.fsf%40MacBook-Pro.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.