Re: Can a given publisher's citations be listed first?

["'William Lupton' via pandoc-discuss" <pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3916 bytes --]

I'm hitting a (non-fatal but annoying) problem. The multibib filter first
runs citeproc to generate a list of all citations, then it reruns citeproc
once for each supplied bibliography file, and this generates warnings for
the citations in the _other_ bibliography files.

For example, the test in the repo works ... but apparently doesn't (and it
took me a while to realise this)!

% make
[WARNING] Citeproc: citation Bae not found
[WARNING] Citeproc: citation Knu86 not found
[WARNING] Citeproc: citation Bel not found
[WARNING] Citeproc: citation Nie72 not found

I think that the best way to avoid the warnings would be to capture and
ignore them, but I'd (much) rather do that only for the secondary citeproc
runs that are _expected_ to output warnings.

Is there a way to do this using the existing utils.citeproc() function? I
tried naively temporarily redefining io.stderr but perhaps that was never
going to work in the presumably-Haskell utils.citeproc().

Thanks,
William

On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 13:03, William Lupton <wlupton-QSt+ys/nuMyEUIsrzH9SikB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
wrote:

> Thanks! https://github.com/pandoc-ext/multibib I assume. I'll look into
> it.
>
> On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 12:53, Bastien DUMONT <bastien.dumont-VwIFZPTo/vqsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I would split my bibliography file in two and use the
>> multiple-bibliographies filter. That's a sometimes irritating limitation of
>> CSL: you can check if a variable is set, but not test its value.
>>
>> Le Friday 08 September 2023 à 11:17:57AM, 'William Lupton' via
>> pandoc-discuss a écrit :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I'd like to sort references so a given publisher's ("BBF") references
>> are
>> > listed first, and am wondering whether it's possible to compare the
>> publisher
>> > variable with "BBF". I tried, but it doesn't seem to work (and the CSL
>> spec.
>> > doesn't appear to indicate that you can do this), so I've fallen back
>> on using
>> > original-publisher (I'll have to make sure that all the BBF references
>> use this
>> > rather than publisher). This works, but I'd prefer the first approach.
>> Any
>> > suggestions?
>> >
>> > CSL is attached.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > William
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email
>> > to [1]pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit [2]
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/
>> > pandoc-discuss/
>> > CAEe_xxi5Q%2BBhE%2BO2EjfnYZAyF%3D_hr7HMcgKHcNKEYoFiJNSraw%
>> 40mail.gmail.com.
>> >
>> > References:
>> >
>> > [1] mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
>> > [2]
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxi5Q%2BBhE%2BO2EjfnYZAyF%3D_hr7HMcgKHcNKEYoFiJNSraw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/ZPsLPLC_YQ-aiL_A%40localhost
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxgf_LcjS%3DZ%3D482ShAeMvMLdrmfHvYbEfMkVShcEuncROw%40mail.gmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5951 bytes --]