Thanks. https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/7400 On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 23:01, John MacFarlane wrote: > > Yes, this definitely used to work. Maybe due to the change to > HsYAML? I will look into it, but an issue on the tracker will > help ensure it doesn't get forgotten. > > BPJ writes: > > > It used to work. > > > > Den mån 21 juni 2021 15:44William Lupton > > skrev: > > > >> All, > >> > >> I don't know how I missed this before, but I have noticed that this > isn't > >> treated as a valid YAML block (at least not with pandoc 2.11.4). > >> > >> *% *cat comment.md > >> > >> --- > >> > >> # comment > >> > >> ... > >> > >> *% *pandoc comment.md > >> > >>
> >> > >>

comment

> >> > >>

> >> > >> Inserting some YAML works: > >> > >> *% *cat comment-plus-variable.md > >> > >> --- > >> > >> # comment > >> > >> variable: 42 > >> > >> ... > >> > >> *% *pandoc comment-plus-variable.md > >> > >> > >> > >> I realise that this is an abuse, and that I could have used an HTML > >> comment (for example), but I believe that this is valid YAML, so should > it > >> have worked? > >> > >> *% *yq eval comment.md > >> > >> > >> > >> # comment > >> > >> > >> > >> *% *yq eval comment-plus-variable.md > >> > >> # comment > >> > >> variable: 42 > >> > >> Apologies if this behaviour has changed in the latest pandoc... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> William > >> > >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 09:10, William Lupton < > wlupton-QSt+ys/nuMyEUIsrzH9SikB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 05:49, John MacFarlane wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> These are good suggestions. I've revised the manual accordingly. > >>>> > >>>> BPJ writes: > >>>> > >>>> > Perhaps it should be pointed out that the body of YAML block scalars > >>>> must > >>>> > be indented relative to the line with the `|` or `>`. Not doing so > is > >>>> > indeed a YAML syntax error, so Pandoc does the right thing when not > >>>> > considering it valid YAML, however unfortunate it is that Pandoc may > >>>> think > >>>> > it is something else. > >>>> > > >>>> > The overview of YAML syntax on Wikipedia is quite good. Perhaps the > >>>> manual > >>>> > could link to (some specific version of) it. > >>>> > > >>>> > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML#Syntax > >>>> > > >>>> > Den ons 2 juni 2021 21:21John MacFarlane skrev: > >>>> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> The problem is that basically anything is valid Markdown, > >>>> >> it's just a matter of how it is interpreted. It does seem > >>>> >> to me that in the second case we might want to at least emit > >>>> >> a warning -- if not downright fail. It's just so unlikely > >>>> >> that someone would write a block beginning with `---` > >>>> >> and ending with `...` and intend it to be something other > >>>> >> than YAML metadata. If you'd like, you could submit an > >>>> >> issue for this. I'd rather not suggest avoiding complex > >>>> >> YAML blocks -- sometimes they're fine, if the syntax is > >>>> >> correct! > >>>> >> > >>>> >> William Lupton writes: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Thanks. Yes, I guess I realised it had something to do with > >>>> ambiguous > >>>> >> > grammars, but I hadn't really considered that my input was a > valid > >>>> table > >>>> >> > (mea culpa). > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > So I thought aha! I'll change the terminating "---" to "..." (in > >>>> the hope > >>>> >> > of an error), but this of course gives the output shown below. > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > I wonder whether there could be a warning in the manual (or maybe > >>>> there > >>>> >> is > >>>> >> > and I've missed it?) and/or perhaps a suggestion that it might > be a > >>>> good > >>>> >> > idea to avoid complex YAML metadata blocks (in favour of metadata > >>>> files)? > >>>> >> > I'd be happy to create an issue and/or a MANUAL.md pull request. > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > % cat bad.md > >>>> >> > --- > >>>> >> > history: > >>>> >> > - number: Release 1.2 > >>>> >> > changes: | > >>>> >> > - TBD > >>>> >> > ... > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > % pandoc bad.md > >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >

history: - number: Release 1.2 changes: | - TBD …

> >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 17:47, John MacFarlane > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> Well, this actually IS a valid "simple table". So how is > >>>> >> >> pandoc to know that you intended it as a YAML metadata block? > >>>> >> >> Pandoc tries first to parse things as YAML blocks, and then as > >>>> >> >> tables, if either works, the parse succeeds with no error. > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> William Lupton writes: > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Should I expect syntax errors in YAML blocks to be detected > and > >>>> >> reported? > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > This has a syntax error in the YAML block: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % cat bad.md > >>>> >> >> > --- > >>>> >> >> > history: > >>>> >> >> > - number: Release 1.2 > >>>> >> >> > changes: | > >>>> >> >> > - TBD > >>>> >> >> > --- > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > This fixes it: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % diff bad.md good.md > >>>> >> >> > 5c5 > >>>> >> >> > < - TBD > >>>> >> >> > --- > >>>> >> >> >> - TBD > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > The latest pandoc: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % ~/Downloads/pandoc-2.14.0.1/bin/pandoc -v > >>>> >> >> > pandoc 2.14.0.1 > >>>> >> >> > ... > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > Pandoc thinks the bad YAML is a table: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % ~/Downloads/pandoc-2.14.0.1/bin/pandoc bad.md > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> >
history:
- number: Release 1.2
changes: |
- TBD
> >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > But it's OK with the good YAML: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % ~/Downloads/pandoc-2.14.0.1/bin/pandoc good.md > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > Parsing the file as YAML reports the error: > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % ~/Downloads/pandoc-2.14.0.1/bin/pandoc --metadata-file > bad.md > >>>> >> >> > Error at "bad.md" (line 5, column 0): > >>>> >> >> > Unexpected ' ' > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > % ~/Downloads/pandoc-2.14.0.1/bin/pandoc --metadata-file > good.md > >>>> >> >> > ^C > >>>> >> >> > > >>>> >> >> > -- > >>>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>>> Google > >>>> >> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. > >>>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > >>>> it, send > >>>> >> >> an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > >>>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxjF3Un2J-xg5UOs7uReZ5cO27TATA%2BfDY%2BAtghAsVhShA%40mail.gmail.com > >>>> >> >> . > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups > >>>> >> "pandoc-discuss" group. > >>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > >>>> send an > >>>> >> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > >>>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>> >> > >>>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m2a6o8ul91.fsf%40johnmacfarlane.net > >>>> >> . > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. > >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send > >>>> an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > >>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CADAJKhC2g4z_H%2BK%2BVtGoVd1T2nmYeMuRrnUquhDPpoYfuxSwWw%40mail.gmail.com > >>>> . > >>>> > >>> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "pandoc-discuss" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxj-bHpfTLDhz5QRz51x-zcs%2BVW5dgWbmRTRaNL%2Bx6Y31Q%40mail.gmail.com > >> < > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxj-bHpfTLDhz5QRz51x-zcs%2BVW5dgWbmRTRaNL%2Bx6Y31Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > > > >> . > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CADAJKhAr3Q_FR8FaubSDUxj692uSwAhKgdVV8mDRw5eU7HmO0g%40mail.gmail.com > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pandoc-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m27dimg9nv.fsf%40Johns-Air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAEe_xxh-geLJmwn4cuYftHAVzA6UZKq9wUkE7s5hPvsUw88%3DEw%40mail.gmail.com.