May I interpret this as that you like my design of Dec 13? :-) https://04037202598852537478.googlegroups.com/attach/b0fb78eaf6e3c/proposed-pandoc-logo-three-documents-for-all.png?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGJHIrrJozQwIbViYmUWAcdKXy7NpDzcDMQhbZCd1An620i28W3CC84ZcWgOcbcfMt_jYQYhWPwCYwhW2x8y70FLJphKdQEYQ35IofM_od3Fgdjhjk The arrows would need more styling, but I'm afraid that may be beyond my skill. Cerebral palsy + graphics + GUI is no good combination! On a more serious note what would @jgm think of such a poll? If *he* thinks it OK/would be of any value I could put a couple of hours this weekend on collecting the various proposals from these threads on a wiki page. If @jgm doesn't find it OK and helpful I agree with Sergio that it wouldn't be right. /bpj tors 19 jan. 2017 kl. 09:47 skrev Sergio Correia : > Personally, I wouldn't use a logo chosen without the approval of John; > would feel a bit rude tbh. That said, we can vote on proposals and pick our > favorites, in order to frame the discussion. > > > About the logo: > > > - We should pick a logo that denotes *what* pandoc does, not *how *it > does it. Users (rightly) don't care that pandoc builds an abstract syntax > tree, so that should not be in the logo. (This is also what BP stated in > his Dec16 post) > - At its core, pandoc converts documents. It converts *.md* into *.html > and so on*. A quick google image search tells us that *the* canonical > icon for conversion is the circle arrow symbol (kinda like the recycling > arrow). example: > http://cracksfree.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/avs-document-converter_98327.jpg > - For documents, any stack would do: > http://images.clipartpanda.com/document-clipart-082004-green-grunge-clipart-icon-business-document4.png > > It's also interesting to see how the rmarkdown folks look at this: > > http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com/images/RMarkdownOutputFormats.png > > > > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 3:03:55 AM UTC-5, Albert Krewinkel wrote: > > 藤原由来 writes: > > > > > > > Then, as some people say, we need commitment of logo in this group (not > only in > > > > this thread). > > > > > > > > I like the idea to release the final logo in the release date of Pandoc > 2.0. > > > > Because meaning (like a story or literature) is important to be > impressively > > > > remembered for people. > > > > > > It seems clear to me that jgm is the only person who can choose an > > > official pandoc logo. > > > > > > However, we, as an community, can still vote on a logo. It won't be > > > official pandoc logo, but the community logo which can be used to brand > > > projects build with or around pandoc. Of course that logo could be > > > changed as soon as an official logo is chosen. > > > > > > My suggestion would be to wait a little while longer before doing any > > > voting, e.g. until the first of March. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pandoc-discuss" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > > To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/dea3f868-3f9c-496e-8d20-5471582f88cb%40googlegroups.com > > . > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CAFC_yuSUbCPEK9neLOLnU3BkPZ2WFLZo4oXLhDNzE9FibVW6Yg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.