The Albert proposition seems cool, but doing it matematically (as a real sheet would fold) lead to a worst result IMHO due to the ends of the folds not being aligned...
I prefer the first proposal from bpj, the one with 4 documents, but how does it scales ? I'm afraid that small characters aren't legible on a 32*32 favicon...
I updated my last proposal:
And the SVG file :
Le mar. 13 déc. 2016 à 21:13, BP Jonsson <bpjonsson-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> a écrit :
So here it is with the ∀ in the middle.
Den 2016-12-13 kl. 20:58, skrev BP Jonsson:
> Well it turned out that I *could* make it symmetrical with only
> three "documents" [**], [<>] and [{}] respectively, the three
> obvious ones. It looks less static too.
>
> Come to think of it the triangular empty space in the middle could
> be overlaid with an ∀ if the three documents touch each other more
> snugly than I made them do.
>
> /bpj
>
> Den 2016-12-13 kl. 18:55, skrev BP Jonsson:
>> Den 2016-12-09 kl. 19:43, skrev Sergio Correia:
>>> Alternatively, translation icons can provide some inspiration:
>>>
>>> https://cdn3.iconfinder.com/data/icons/text-editor-1/24/Translate-512.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I had a go on that idea, combined with some others which have come
>> up, heeding the KISS principle, keeping it monochrome -- it must
>> print well in b/w documents! -- and being conservative with black
>> ink because I think too much black gives a hard and heavy feel.
>>
>> The symbolism is hopefully obvious. Asterisks are used for
>> emphasis in several (all?) of the light markup formats Pandoc
>> supports. Several others use angle bracket markup, and some
>> use braces prominently (notably LaTeX and JSON). To be honest the
>> fourth symbol was harder to come up with, but the @ may allude to
>> Pandoc's citation markup (and to BibTeX). Perhaps $$,
>> for math, would have been better, preserving the pairing/delimiter
>> theme?
>>
>> Someone who is more of an artist than I am could certainly realize
>> the idea better than I can, of course!
>>
>> (SVG version obtainable on request)
>>
>> /bpj
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pandoc-discuss/1bKIuyBnWaQ/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/5bba1098-d1c9-9d7e-0fbb-3914abd93364%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.