Re: citeproc and "related" field

["'Nick Bart' via pandoc-discuss" <pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>]

To the best of my knowledge, CSL does not provide any mechanisms for dealing with relations between different items. (For example, that’s why pandoc-citeproc needs to pull all the data from a `crossref`ed item and fold it into the `crossref`ing item when translating from bibtex/biblatex to CSL JSON/YAML.)

CSL-M has “`cs:alternative` to add supplementary reference information to a cited item, such as a translation or reprint” (https://citeproc-js.readthedocs.io/en/latest/csl-m/index.html#cs-alternative-extension), but even if we were to consider adding CSL-M extensions to pandoc-citeproc, we would still have to fold all the information from a number of different biblatex items (translation/reprint; orig. lang. version; earlier print; …) into one CSL JSON/YAML item.

Anyone who sees this a unsatisfactory could of course submit a proposal for enhancing CSL itself (https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues).


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 6:17 AM, John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> The question is whether CSL has any variables corresponding to
> these things.
>
> http://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html#standard-variables
>
> If so, we could try to be smarter about translating from
> bibtex/biblatex to citeproc json. If not, then it's out of scope
> for pandoc-citeproc.
>
> Guido Milanese guido.milanese-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org writes:
>
> > I am seriously experimenting pandoc filter "citeproc" as an interesting
> > alternative to the workflow I am more used to, i.e. markdown to write and
> > then compilation -- through pandoc -- as LaTeX + biber + Biblatex. I
> > noticed that the filter supports the BibTeX "crossref" field (e.g. an
> > article published in a volume of Proceedings) but not the "related" fields,
> > such as "translationof", "multivolume" and the like. Is this feature
> > planned? This would be a great advantage for those who save data in BibTeX
> > format.
> > Thank you. The pandoc "constellation" is incredibly useful and truly smart.
> > guido (NW Italy)
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/6a9af74f-d011-4733-a984-7c8f460ee41c%40googlegroups.com.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m2pnl0icnm.fsf%40johnmacfarlane.net.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/_YdyL8q3jBoJ-JMffharjdfWIMGA7ANVgMtHkCOOd7CneS3SPlY32aCAKl1VkkVLkrNoomKBp42dHQ3crkF5-OAsr330aQphFgdAvZ4j43k%3D%40protonmail.com.