Re: WIP: better citation processing

[Denis Maier <denis.maier.lists-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5105 bytes --]

Awesome. Thanks. We should also add this to the ConTeXt writer.

Side issue: Why is the Frege example "Über sinn und bedeutung" sentence 
cased?

Best,
Denis


Am 17.09.2020 um 19:18 schrieb John MacFarlane:
> Progress report: I've added support for CSL display attributes to the 
> LaTeX writer in the citeproc branch.   (Still TODO: docx, HTML, others?)
> Some examples:
>
> Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.12.43 AM.pngScreen Shot 2020-09-17 at 
> 10.13.22 AM.png
> Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.13.44 AM.png
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 9:43:57 AM UTC-7 Denis Maier wrote:
>
>
>
>     Am 11.09.2020 um 22:58 schrieb John MacFarlane:
>     > Yes, we could definitely consider adding support for
>     > these things at a later date.
>     >
>     > By-section citations would actually be pretty easy.
>     Sounds great!
>
>     > Multiple bibliographies is also simple IF it's just
>     > a matter of separating items out of a formatted bibliography
>     > into several separate ones. But if it's going to affect
>     > things like disambiguation then it would be trickier.
>     As outlined on the github issue, I think a simple solution could be
>     allowing multiple bibliographies, each with filters applied that
>     either
>     exclude or include specific items based on different criteria.
>
>     >
>     > The cito thing seems more special-case, but maybe that too.
>     >
>     > Denis Maier <denis.ma...-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>     >
>     >> Am 11.09.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Albert Krewinkel:
>     >>> John MacFarlane writes:
>     >>>
>     >>>> It would be good to get clear on this. We could expose
>     >>>> a --citeproc and require it to be used to process citations.
>     >>>> That would also give control of order; it could be treated as
>     >>>> a built-in filter. So maybe it's the thing to do -- but I did
>     >>>> like the idea of doing it automatically.
>     >>> I agree, that's much nicer. Would an additional `--no-citeproc`
>     >>> option make sense? It could suppress the automatic run.
>     >>>
>     >>>> It should be pretty straightforward to expose this to Lua
>     >>>> filters. (But again, I'd be curious to hear why calling
>     >>>> manually from Lua filters would be needed.) At heart it's just a
>     >>>> Pandoc -> m Pandoc transformation in PandocMonad.
>     >>> Indeed, that should be really easy then. :)
>     >>>
>     >>> Lua filters which call out to pandoc-citeproc, or which rely on a
>     >>> special filter order:
>     >>>
>     >>> - cito: allows to add information about the semantic relation
>     of the
>     >>> cited work to the current document. Plugs into the citation
>     syntax and
>     >>> requires citation IDs to be rewritten before pandoc-citeproc is
>     >>> called.
>     >>>
>     >>> - section-refs: adds "References" for all first level
>     sections; creates
>     >>> temporary documents from sections, then calls
>     `pandoc-citeproc` on
>     >>> the temporary docs.
>     >>>
>     >>> - multiple-bibliographies: allows to partition references into
>     >>> categories; implementation is similar to section-refs.
>     >> Adding a `-citeproc` option would be a good option.
>     >> But that aside, I think that these particular filters (or
>     replacements
>     >> thereof) could/should be included in the new citeproc library.
>     >>
>     >>> --
>     >>> Albert Krewinkel
>     >>> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
>     >>>
>     >> --
>     >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>     Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>     >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>     it, send an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>     >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>     https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1adfb0c1-d745-a6dc-bf14-f790e3f1280f%40mailbox.org.
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org 
> <mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d7317035-fba6-466b-8d6e-699f82ae5445n%40googlegroups.com 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d7317035-fba6-466b-8d6e-699f82ae5445n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a3a6d888-3a82-e29d-d723-7a754c7b964c%40mailbox.org.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9384 bytes --]