Awesome. Thanks. We should also add this to the ConTeXt writer.

Side issue: Why is the Frege example "Über sinn und bedeutung" sentence cased?

Best,
Denis


Am 17.09.2020 um 19:18 schrieb John MacFarlane:
Progress report: I've added support for CSL display attributes to the LaTeX writer in the citeproc branch.   (Still TODO: docx, HTML, others?)
Some examples:

Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.12.43 AM.pngScreen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.13.22 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.13.44 AM.png
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 9:43:57 AM UTC-7 Denis Maier wrote:


Am 11.09.2020 um 22:58 schrieb John MacFarlane:
> Yes, we could definitely consider adding support for
> these things at a later date.
>
> By-section citations would actually be pretty easy.
Sounds great!

> Multiple bibliographies is also simple IF it's just
> a matter of separating items out of a formatted bibliography
> into several separate ones. But if it's going to affect
> things like disambiguation then it would be trickier.
As outlined on the github issue, I think a simple solution could be
allowing multiple bibliographies, each with filters applied that either
exclude or include specific items based on different criteria.

>
> The cito thing seems more special-case, but maybe that too.
>
> Denis Maier <denis.ma...@mailbox.org> writes:
>
>> Am 11.09.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Albert Krewinkel:
>>> John MacFarlane writes:
>>>
>>>> It would be good to get clear on this. We could expose
>>>> a --citeproc and require it to be used to process citations.
>>>> That would also give control of order; it could be treated as
>>>> a built-in filter. So maybe it's the thing to do -- but I did
>>>> like the idea of doing it automatically.
>>> I agree, that's much nicer. Would an additional `--no-citeproc`
>>> option make sense? It could suppress the automatic run.
>>>
>>>> It should be pretty straightforward to expose this to Lua
>>>> filters. (But again, I'd be curious to hear why calling
>>>> manually from Lua filters would be needed.) At heart it's just a
>>>> Pandoc -> m Pandoc transformation in PandocMonad.
>>> Indeed, that should be really easy then. :)
>>>
>>> Lua filters which call out to pandoc-citeproc, or which rely on a
>>> special filter order:
>>>
>>> - cito: allows to add information about the semantic relation of the
>>> cited work to the current document. Plugs into the citation syntax and
>>> requires citation IDs to be rewritten before pandoc-citeproc is
>>> called.
>>>
>>> - section-refs: adds "References" for all first level sections; creates
>>> temporary documents from sections, then calls `pandoc-citeproc` on
>>> the temporary docs.
>>>
>>> - multiple-bibliographies: allows to partition references into
>>> categories; implementation is similar to section-refs.
>> Adding a `-citeproc` option would be a good option.
>> But that aside, I think that these particular filters (or replacements
>> thereof) could/should be included in the new citeproc library.
>>
>>> --
>>> Albert Krewinkel
>>> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1adfb0c1-d745-a6dc-bf14-f790e3f1280f%40mailbox.org.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh4Ykp1iOSErHA@public.gmane.orgm.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d7317035-fba6-466b-8d6e-699f82ae5445n%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a3a6d888-3a82-e29d-d723-7a754c7b964c%40mailbox.org.