Am 11.09.2020 um 23:14 schrieb Denis Maier:

Am 11.09.2020 um 22:58 schrieb John MacFarlane:
> Yes, we could definitely consider adding support for
> these things at a later date.
>
> By-section citations would actually be pretty easy.
Sounds great!

> Multiple bibliographies is also simple IF it's just
> a matter of separating items out of a formatted bibliography
> into several separate ones.  But if it's going to affect
> things like disambiguation then it would be trickier.
As outlined on the github issue, I think a simple solution could be 
allowing multiple bibliographies, each with filters applied that either 
exclude or include specific items based on different criteria.

Denis Maier <denis.maier.lists-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> Am 11.09.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Albert Krewinkel:
>>> John MacFarlane writes:
>>>
>>>> It would be good to get clear on this.  We could expose
>>>> a --citeproc and require it to be used to process citations.
>>>> That would also give control of order; it could be treated as
>>>> a built-in filter.  So maybe it's the thing to do -- but I did
>>>> like the idea of doing it automatically.
>>> I agree, that's much nicer. Would an additional `--no-citeproc`
>>> option make sense? It could suppress the automatic run.
>>>
>>>> It should be pretty straightforward to expose this to Lua
>>>> filters.  (But again, I'd be curious to hear why calling
>>>> manually from Lua filters would be needed.) At heart it's just a
>>>> Pandoc -> m Pandoc transformation in PandocMonad.
>>> Indeed, that should be really easy then. :)
>>>
>>> Lua filters which call out to pandoc-citeproc, or which rely on a
>>> special filter order:
>>>
>>> - cito: allows to add information about the semantic relation of the
>>>     cited work to the current document. Plugs into the citation syntax and
>>>     requires citation IDs to be rewritten before pandoc-citeproc is
>>>     called.
>>>
>>> - section-refs: adds "References" for all first level sections; creates
>>>     temporary documents from sections, then calls `pandoc-citeproc` on
>>>     the temporary docs.
>>>
>>> - multiple-bibliographies: allows to partition references into
>>>     categories; implementation is similar to section-refs.
>> Adding a `-citeproc` option would be a good option.
>> But that aside, I think that these particular filters (or replacements
>> thereof) could/should be included in the new citeproc library.
>>
>>> --
>>> Albert Krewinkel
>>> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe  e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1adfb0c1-d745-a6dc-bf14-f790e3f1280f%40mailbox.org.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a3c8f8e1-c695-2cf7-ef74-7a6622debef8%40gmail.com.