public inbox archive for pandoc-discuss@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* single underscores remain converting from commonmark to plain
@ 2022-09-05  4:43 John
       [not found] ` <d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: John @ 2022-09-05  4:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pandoc-discuss


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

When I convert to plain text from commonmark the _word_ strings retain 
their underscores.
I expect them to just become the word without the underscores. Is their an 
option for this?

pandoc -f commonmark -t plain test.md

test.md:

**word**
__word__
*word*
_word_

output

WORD WORD _word_ _word_


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: single underscores remain converting from commonmark to plain
       [not found] ` <d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2022-09-05 19:15   ` John MacFarlane
       [not found]     ` <E2FA51D8-B544-497E-B32E-0E832A59AD17-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: John MacFarlane @ 2022-09-05 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw

No.  Plain output roughly follows Project Gutenberg plain text conventions.

However, if you want all emphasis to be removed entirely, you can use a small Lua filter:

function Emph(el)
  return el.content
end

save as deEmph.lua and use --lua-filter deEmph.lua on the command line.


> On Sep 4, 2022, at 9:43 PM, John <urbanjost-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> When I convert to plain text from commonmark the _word_ strings retain their underscores.
> I expect them to just become the word without the underscores. Is their an option for this?
> 
> pandoc -f commonmark -t plain test.md
> 
> test.md:
> 
> **word**
> __word__
> *word*
> _word_
> 
> output
> 
> WORD WORD _word_ _word_
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can%40googlegroups.com.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: single underscores remain converting from commonmark to plain
       [not found]     ` <E2FA51D8-B544-497E-B32E-0E832A59AD17-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2022-09-05 20:12       ` John
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John @ 2022-09-05 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pandoc-discuss


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1825 bytes --]


Well, that appears to be perfect!  Exactly what I needed; I thought I was 
going to have to create a filter for the output.
Thanks!
On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 3:15:14 PM UTC-4 fiddlosopher wrote:

> No. Plain output roughly follows Project Gutenberg plain text conventions.
>
> However, if you want all emphasis to be removed entirely, you can use a 
> small Lua filter:
>
> function Emph(el)
> return el.content
> end
>
> save as deEmph.lua and use --lua-filter deEmph.lua on the command line.
>
>
> > On Sep 4, 2022, at 9:43 PM, John <urba...-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > 
> > When I convert to plain text from commonmark the _word_ strings retain 
> their underscores.
> > I expect them to just become the word without the underscores. Is their 
> an option for this?
> > 
> > pandoc -f commonmark -t plain test.md
> > 
> > test.md:
> > 
> > **word**
> > __word__
> > *word*
> > _word_
> > 
> > output
> > 
> > WORD WORD _word_ _word_
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/a876b4e1-148f-470f-b49a-db02458d4078n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2993 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-05 20:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-05  4:43 single underscores remain converting from commonmark to plain John
     [not found] ` <d2501388-9bbd-4fe2-abf8-5224d0d957can-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-05 19:15   ` John MacFarlane
     [not found]     ` <E2FA51D8-B544-497E-B32E-0E832A59AD17-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-05 20:12       ` John

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).