Re: WIP: better citation processing

[Denis Maier <denis.maier.lists-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>]

Am 11.09.2020 um 23:14 schrieb Denis Maier:
>
>
> Am 11.09.2020 um 22:58 schrieb John MacFarlane:
>> Yes, we could definitely consider adding support for
>> these things at a later date.
>>
>> By-section citations would actually be pretty easy.
> Sounds great!
>
>> Multiple bibliographies is also simple IF it's just
>> a matter of separating items out of a formatted bibliography
>> into several separate ones.  But if it's going to affect
>> things like disambiguation then it would be trickier.
> As outlined on the github issue, I think a simple solution could be 
> allowing multiple bibliographies, each with filters applied that 
> either exclude or include specific items based on different criteria.
>
>>
>> The cito thing seems more special-case, but maybe that too.
>>
>> Denis Maier <denis.maier.lists-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>>> Am 11.09.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Albert Krewinkel:
>>>> John MacFarlane writes:
>>>>
>>>>> It would be good to get clear on this.  We could expose
>>>>> a --citeproc and require it to be used to process citations.
>>>>> That would also give control of order; it could be treated as
>>>>> a built-in filter.  So maybe it's the thing to do -- but I did
>>>>> like the idea of doing it automatically.
>>>> I agree, that's much nicer. Would an additional `--no-citeproc`
>>>> option make sense? It could suppress the automatic run.
>>>>
>>>>> It should be pretty straightforward to expose this to Lua
>>>>> filters.  (But again, I'd be curious to hear why calling
>>>>> manually from Lua filters would be needed.) At heart it's just a
>>>>> Pandoc -> m Pandoc transformation in PandocMonad.
>>>> Indeed, that should be really easy then. :)
>>>>
>>>> Lua filters which call out to pandoc-citeproc, or which rely on a
>>>> special filter order:
>>>>
>>>> - cito: allows to add information about the semantic relation of the
>>>>     cited work to the current document. Plugs into the citation 
>>>> syntax and
>>>>     requires citation IDs to be rewritten before pandoc-citeproc is
>>>>     called.
>>>>
>>>> - section-refs: adds "References" for all first level sections; 
>>>> creates
>>>>     temporary documents from sections, then calls `pandoc-citeproc` on
>>>>     the temporary docs.
>>>>
>>>> - multiple-bibliographies: allows to partition references into
>>>>     categories; implementation is similar to section-refs.
>>> Adding a `-citeproc` option would be a good option.
>>> But that aside, I think that these particular filters (or replacements
>>> thereof) could/should be included in the new citeproc library.
>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Albert Krewinkel
>>>> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe  e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1adfb0c1-d745-a6dc-bf14-f790e3f1280f%40mailbox.org.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/af98c088-941f-36d1-ac9b-a263fc46a219%40mailbox.org.