I find the pilcrows don’t work very well when used to write Pandoc without some further graphical editing. It just shows that it’s not the letter P of that font. If we’d want to use the pilcrow as part of a wordmark, some qualified person will probably need to do some designing. 

Speaking of which, the pandoc website could probably also use a graphical update. Not saying the current state of things is bad, but if we are going to have an official logo, might as well do it properly, with something resembling a visual identify to go along with. Nothing fancy, but something consistent and with proper spacing etc. that’s less historically grown than the current website.

P.S. I know open source projects are known to struggle with design work (probably because it requires skills so different to programming? I don't know...) As a commandline-tool/library, pandoc so far didn't have the need for it at all...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/afa46a2c-3db0-46e4-8b4c-21acce284234%40googlegroups.com.