Hello,

I actually know implicit_header_references but I actually misunderstood it. 
I thought this extension was managing the implicit identifier that exists 
in headers.

Then indeed, I think that would be fair to have something similar, maybe 
implicit_caption_references. But maybe that would also be possible to 
extend the implicit_header_references to any identifier ?

Louis

Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 11:56:58 UTC+2, Albert Krewinkel a écrit :

> Louis <lra...-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > I don't want an hyperlink but an internal link (<url>#mypic in html).
> >
> > What I can eventually do is [my picture](#mypic)
> >
> > ...while for other labels like headers, it only requires [mypic]
>
> Pandoc has a Markdown extension named `implicit_header_references` that
> allows [mypic] instead of the longer syntax:
> https://pandoc.org/MANUAL#extension-implicit_header_references
>
> So if I understand correctly, you are asking for something like an
> `implicit_image_references` extension that would allow to reference a
> picture like `![my image caption](mypic.png)` with just `[my image
> caption]`.
>
> Did I get that right?
>
>
> -- 
> Albert Krewinkel
> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/b080bbbc-2ed5-4a1d-a8af-edfd50e7a679n%40googlegroups.com.