I actually know implicit_header_references but I actually misunderstood it. I thought this extension was managing the implicit identifier that exists in headers.

Then indeed, I think that would be fair to have something similar, maybe implicit_caption_references. But maybe that would also be possible to extend the implicit_header_references to any identifier ?

Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 11:56:58 UTC+2, Albert Krewinkel a écrit :

Louis <lra...@baylibre.com> writes:

> I don't want an hyperlink but an internal link (<url>#mypic in html).
>
> What I can eventually do is [my picture](#mypic)
>
> ...while for other labels like headers, it only requires [mypic]

Pandoc has a Markdown extension named `implicit_header_references` that
allows [mypic] instead of the longer syntax:
https://pandoc.org/MANUAL#extension-implicit_header_references

So if I understand correctly, you are asking for something like an
`implicit_image_references` extension that would allow to reference a
picture like `![my image caption](mypic.png)` with just `[my image
caption]`.

Did I get that right?

--
Albert Krewinkel
GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124