From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.text.pandoc/24326 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: mb21 Newsgroups: gmane.text.pandoc Subject: Re: RFC: Designing Logo of Pandoc Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 02:02:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: Reply-To: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2316_922660859.1580551361464" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="56126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: pandoc-discuss Original-X-From: pandoc-discuss+bncBDCMBBVJ5EFBBQ4Z2XYQKGQEMF543UQ-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Sat Feb 01 11:02:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f55.google.com ([209.85.210.55]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixpbz-000ESW-9j for gtp-pandoc-discuss@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:02:47 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f55.google.com with SMTP id z62sf5153179otb.0 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:02:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=4UrMC3iJB/Gf2wQmfsQmPtQQRCIsnX+Bzcj6LirGFls=; b=cnV5F33cWn58hcCNd34Ce9urXPSOpz9UH8rkzXA6P4q21IqVUx/iZPFmtvBEwFh38S 9Y/vyixdjYYNWesZC4tHGAMIJnyT2TyaNNxmiVIvK/pGu1iCk7Uy/+k46u62uJh3F8ho 85/Rwfy9Oolt8T8nwAXVM+QawObIIfcZj0H0reCCIE+1nW+FXj7JmWKOtd2EUufH2CmT R8vmB7ToNGYohUP/1TM2EQp/jIq2CSilItK5o5yyuFqnfRXtod0UCcf5tQrB/QOT847W PRRhHFNtwz2bVWbyF7ue2dIkzVK/2Gc6nkIXE7pvyIvw3L/cu5D4/I0LVxPzaopq6smZ piGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=4UrMC3iJB/Gf2wQmfsQmPtQQRCIsnX+Bzcj6LirGFls=; b=Zxedoe5hMEbItwmSlXdoUKxoTwyq/038xpzQeunZunBZzh4MkD3APkqnAQF+M7083E x8sGC9KELuKJXcQptts8D91vGX03nyO3ETAjYqsXdlPFIdIlJVcOQwUT/nLAWEOPKq/M gjmSc0/iBOZOtIh0U2YlFifqgMwp2JiPPQwCiix/6cpxTqM4vxBrPrJmflpxe58XJiXi lXkPtmYafL45gLWOZUYVTW8vE9D9a0cLLT7ks4XDlxj+2XaFNYLsuSGmd4DO7foRsM1p UfJp1LnNlfxMqjA3+0lQYhXmNLpHiRTj1+GZw6YSrS8wDe8ekl5Z50smXz+DcOh++H2Y a6yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=4UrMC3iJB/Gf2wQmfsQmPtQQRCIsnX+Bzcj6LirGFls=; b=kjL2l1ANVjEg+e19syYCAvkio2RlcgtYIkNjRyriAcfRUrny5HSl/gPmS2AbAtL1fM vYeIEyvfy0XCOZPjIGgAS30XUaTUxyXsA/j0BOyNqj7hGeui28EfaW+IFlQ+sjisI0OJ n3+8ZYoL//yKUnO9FJQBD+PAHRt0heNUZry4Dg30uDNp96TfNpK6A4sHoVFqe4GqJYYx L/AL/XEq7F7F8Tp8msTdOSJ80KDfwK+lWN+n53aO9KmRcTz8yGO1txwmOo16KYwkoUTv B08PZk6X8yCQLq6fbwXnALuhFqx83KGv9xc2mv23NdbihLHzkI52rNETL0iv32Gq4f0D Kg1Q== Original-Sender: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDPxxRlfcRowD4viBDazEf1cPFVqjGBtqFuxfkKAHYhVzxRTeE EBuWHFIsJZjBMvIR/nOZt/4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwYpBkWQTPTp9BvcTVH9RzHYrRNmPbCx8G17v+B1Ebi178EYPAcXZfVbVg6kVqeHsinjeaCJA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:231d:: with SMTP id u29mr11121018ote.185.1580551366310; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:02:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Original-Received: by 2002:a9d:5a87:: with SMTP id w7ls1164266oth.1.gmail; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:02:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6751:: with SMTP id w17mr677066otm.332.1580551362740; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:02:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: mauro.bieg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org; contact pandoc-discuss+owners-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1007024079513 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.text.pandoc:24326 Archived-At: ------=_Part_2316_922660859.1580551361464 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2317_995393640.1580551361465" ------=_Part_2317_995393640.1580551361465 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > I do think that it makes sense, if we have a logo, to have the canonical version be a particular vector image, and not just, say, a reverse pilcrow typeset any old way. That's not a logo, it's just a symbol. I agree. I also think that Yuki raised a great point: the logo needs to work (be recognizable) when it's scaled down to favicon size (32x32px). That's a great objective test for a logo. I'll even go out on a limb here and say that I would (most probably) be fine with every logo that passes that test. The test probably weeds out 99% of the logo proposals that I subjectively would feel are amateurish. For an even strong test, scale it down to 16x16px. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/b3c94952-a9ae-4ba5-83ec-38f522e0ac06%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_2317_995393640.1580551361465 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I do think that it makes sense, if we have a log= o, to have=C2=A0
the canonical version be a particular vector ima= ge, and not=C2=A0
just, say, a reverse pilcrow typeset any old wa= y. That's not a=C2=A0
logo, it's just a symbol.

I agree.


I also thi= nk that Yuki raised a great point: the logo needs to work (be recognizable)= when it's scaled down to favicon size (32x32px). That's a great ob= jective test for a logo. I'll even go out on a limb here and say that I= would (most probably) be fine with every logo that passes that test. The t= est probably weeds out 99% of the logo proposals that I subjectively would = feel are amateurish. For an even strong test, scale it down to 16x16px.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to pand= oc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/= msgid/pandoc-discuss/b3c94952-a9ae-4ba5-83ec-38f522e0ac06%40googlegroups.co= m.
------=_Part_2317_995393640.1580551361465-- ------=_Part_2316_922660859.1580551361464--