Agreed, using the reversed pilcrow as a letter P is not a good idea.

For the moment I would propose that we just settle on a font so we have *something* for a logo.

Beyond that, someone with at least some graphic design skills would be needed.

For me, the motivation was that I needed something to put on a button in an Atom package I'm developing, see attached.



On Thursday, January 2, 2020 at 10:19:40 AM UTC, mb21 wrote:
I find the pilcrows don’t work very well when used to write Pandoc without some further graphical editing. It just shows that it’s not the letter P of that font. If we’d want to use the pilcrow as part of a wordmark, some qualified person will probably need to do some designing. 

Speaking of which, the pandoc website could probably also use a graphical update. Not saying the current state of things is bad, but if we are going to have an official logo, might as well do it properly, with something resembling a visual identify to go along with. Nothing fancy, but something consistent and with proper spacing etc. that’s less historically grown than the current website.

P.S. I know open source projects are known to struggle with design work (probably because it requires skills so different to programming? I don't know...) As a commandline-tool/library, pandoc so far didn't have the need for it at all...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/c3dcb843-c8c9-4ea1-8dcc-7cd742f8f746%40googlegroups.com.