AW: AW: custom writer with haskell

[<denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org>]

That's maybe true. So what's your take on that? Do you think including a Haskell interpreter would be a good idea?

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 18. Dezember 2021 20:46
> An: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) <denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org>; pandoc-
> discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: custom writer with haskell
> 
> 
> <denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
> > Does that have to be included? Can't one rely on Haskell being available? I
> mean, just like with Haskell filters....
> 
> By the time you've got your environment set up with ghc and all the libraries
> installed properly, which you'd need to run interpreted writers, you might as
> well just recompile pandoc with the revised module.  I don't see a big
> advantage.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/c8f145c9d80f470f9adea4e3df82aab4%40unibe.ch.