On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 04:32:42 UTC+10 John MacFarlane wrote:
The current design expects that, either you're going to
manually specify identifiers when you need them, or you'll
use auto_identifiers. The mix can be problematic.
The problem is that auto_identifiers is enabled by default,
and using explicit identifiers doesn't turn it off.
Why don't you submit this as a bug report on GitHub?
Shir <shird...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> I have a `test.md` that looks like this:
>
> ```
> # test
>
> # test {#test}
> ```
>
> I ran `pandoc test.md --to latex --from markdown` and expected to get the
> following:
>
> ```
> \hypertarget{test}{%
> \section{test}\label{test-1}}
>
> \hypertarget{test}{%
> \section{test}\label{test}}
> ```
>
> Instead, I got:
>
> ```
> [WARNING] Duplicate identifier 'test' at line 6 column 1
> \hypertarget{test}{%
> \section{test}\label{test}}
>
> \hypertarget{test}{%
> \section{test}\label{test}}
> ```
>
> Turning `auto_identifiers` off "fixes" this by not giving the first
> instance a label. But shouldn't `auto_identifiers` be able to automatically
> label headings while taking into account existing IDs?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discus...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/099f0289-7ff2-4f84-b983-8af49f257915n%40googlegroups.com.