> I also think that Yuki raised a great point: the logo needs to work (be 
> recognizable) when it's scaled down to favicon size (32x32px). That's a 
> great objective test for a logo. I'll even go out on a limb here and say 
> that I would (most probably) be fine with every logo that passes that test. 
> The test probably weeds out 99% of the logo proposals that I subjectively 
> would feel are amateurish. For an even strong test, scale it down to 
> 16x16px.
>

see:
- https://trillioncreative.com/does-your-logo-pass-piccolino-test/
- 
https://entrepreneurshandbook.co/the-7-step-paul-rand-logo-test-5c7b546af17b?gi=abd7588900ab 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d4e8b03e-5564-4be5-9af8-b539c2158b19%40googlegroups.com.