Progress report: I've added support for CSL display attributes to the LaTeX 
writer in the citeproc branch.   (Still TODO: docx, HTML, others?)
Some examples:

[image: Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.12.43 AM.png][image: Screen Shot 
2020-09-17 at 10.13.22 AM.png]
[image: Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 10.13.44 AM.png]
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 9:43:57 AM UTC-7 Denis Maier wrote:

>
>
> Am 11.09.2020 um 22:58 schrieb John MacFarlane:
> > Yes, we could definitely consider adding support for
> > these things at a later date.
> >
> > By-section citations would actually be pretty easy.
> Sounds great!
>
> > Multiple bibliographies is also simple IF it's just
> > a matter of separating items out of a formatted bibliography
> > into several separate ones. But if it's going to affect
> > things like disambiguation then it would be trickier.
> As outlined on the github issue, I think a simple solution could be 
> allowing multiple bibliographies, each with filters applied that either 
> exclude or include specific items based on different criteria.
>
> >
> > The cito thing seems more special-case, but maybe that too.
> >
> > Denis Maier <denis.ma...-cl+VPiYnx/1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> >
> >> Am 11.09.2020 um 18:46 schrieb Albert Krewinkel:
> >>> John MacFarlane writes:
> >>>
> >>>> It would be good to get clear on this. We could expose
> >>>> a --citeproc and require it to be used to process citations.
> >>>> That would also give control of order; it could be treated as
> >>>> a built-in filter. So maybe it's the thing to do -- but I did
> >>>> like the idea of doing it automatically.
> >>> I agree, that's much nicer. Would an additional `--no-citeproc`
> >>> option make sense? It could suppress the automatic run.
> >>>
> >>>> It should be pretty straightforward to expose this to Lua
> >>>> filters. (But again, I'd be curious to hear why calling
> >>>> manually from Lua filters would be needed.) At heart it's just a
> >>>> Pandoc -> m Pandoc transformation in PandocMonad.
> >>> Indeed, that should be really easy then. :)
> >>>
> >>> Lua filters which call out to pandoc-citeproc, or which rely on a
> >>> special filter order:
> >>>
> >>> - cito: allows to add information about the semantic relation of the
> >>> cited work to the current document. Plugs into the citation syntax and
> >>> requires citation IDs to be rewritten before pandoc-citeproc is
> >>> called.
> >>>
> >>> - section-refs: adds "References" for all first level sections; creates
> >>> temporary documents from sections, then calls `pandoc-citeproc` on
> >>> the temporary docs.
> >>>
> >>> - multiple-bibliographies: allows to partition references into
> >>> categories; implementation is similar to section-refs.
> >> Adding a `-citeproc` option would be a good option.
> >> But that aside, I think that these particular filters (or replacements
> >> thereof) could/should be included in the new citeproc library.
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Albert Krewinkel
> >>> GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
> >>>
> >> -- 
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1adfb0c1-d745-a6dc-bf14-f790e3f1280f%40mailbox.org
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/d7317035-fba6-466b-8d6e-699f82ae5445n%40googlegroups.com.