I think that reference handling is the last feature that pandoc is missing.
Including both pandoc-crossref and pandoc-fignos would be a great solution to have native reference handling with pandoc, so if there is a discussion on opinions, I am definitely on the "let's do it" side!
This is a great question, and I would like to know what people think?On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 13:35:23 UTC J wrote:It seems to me from googling that pandoc-crossref is good for cross-references in markdown. Would you consider pandoc-crossref to be added ? Or would you consider pandoc-fignos better for the task ?
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 4:44:34 AM UTC+8, John MacFarlane wrote:I've sometimes thought of including pandoc-fignos, just as
we now include pandoc-citeproc. That might be a good move
until we have better native reference handling.
+++ Alexandre Bergel [Mar 03 18 09:11 ]:
> Hi!
> I spent a few hours looking for a better way to make references in
> Pandoc. Why the pandoc-fignos filter is not part of the default pandoc
> distribution? I was really about to stop using pandoc because of the
> poor handling of references.
> I guess there is a pretty good reason why not doing so... which is?
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [1]pandoc-discus...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [2]pandoc-...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> [3]https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/7a642901-09bd-4fd4-
> b529-568d79d17b7b%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit [4]https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>References
>