@jgm: are you ready to make a decision? Vollkorn/Tinos/Karma/Belgrano?
Or would you rather have us collect more options?
C

On Thursday, December 19, 2019 at 11:01:25 PM UTC, allefeld wrote:
>
> Ok, a little update, not too important but strange.
>
> I now downloaded the Tinos font and found that (according to FontForge) it 
> does not actually contain a reversed pilcrow glyph.
>
> The samples I sent I prepared as HTML with CSS according to the Google 
> Fonts API. I went to great lengths to avoid replacement characters to be 
> shown, which browsers apparently incessantly do. Concretely, I additionally 
> embedded the special "AdobeBlank" font which contains all Unicode code 
> points, but with a blank glyph for them, and then I had code like this,
>
>   <p class="sample" style="font-family: Tinos, AdobeBlank">⁋</p>
>
> to ensure that if the font does not contain the reversed pilcrow, nothing 
> is shown. That seems to have worked for most fonts, but not for Tinos. 
> There must be some special witchery at work. ;)
>
> Anyway, that reduces the set of true & jgm-approved reversed pilcrows to 
> one, Vollkorn.
>
> For the fun of it, attached what it looks like if one uses the reversed 
> pilcrow as if it was a P.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/e7cb59b7-00c5-401e-954f-4f010a7ea360%40googlegroups.com.