All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones

All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones

[Frederik Elwert]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1617 bytes --]

Hello everybody,

when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9→2.13), and thus 
switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we noticed a change in 
behaviour:

We are converting all references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd 
them within the markdown file through the `references` metadata variable.

Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printed in 
the bibliography. That’s what we expected. Now, with citeproc, we find that 
*all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the bibliography. 
This is different from taking the same entries, putting them in an external 
bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography` metadata key. If we 
do that, we get the old behaviour.

So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`.

Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this a bug/regression?

(For us, the older behaviour worked better, because often authors have 
additional entries in their bibliography, against the guidelines. The old 
behaviour made sure we only include those that are actually cited. Now we 
have to check the references list manually.)

Thanks in advance,
Frederik

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2060 bytes --]

Re: All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones

['Nick Bart' via pandoc-discuss]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2522 bytes --]

I’m seeing this, too (using the most recent dev version), and agree in preferring the ‘old’ behaviour.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, June 11, 2021 11:44 AM, Frederik Elwert <frederik.elwert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9→2.13), and thus switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we noticed a change in behaviour:
>
> We are converting all references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd them within the markdown file through the `references` metadata variable.
>
> Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printed in the bibliography. That’s what we expected. Now, with citeproc, we find that *all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the bibliography. This is different from taking the same entries, putting them in an external bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography` metadata key. If we do that, we get the old behaviour.
>
> So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`.
>
> Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this a bug/regression?
>
> (For us, the older behaviour worked better, because often authors have additional entries in their bibliography, against the guidelines. The old behaviour made sure we only include those that are actually cited. Now we have to check the references list manually.)
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Frederik
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/CRL_E3dQzLfOhyxpbNzi-raNcRKpow0Vs0jXxcjNID3K_nGu9AnbSVOO3MRI3ODFkeKDKUQm8nJssiqoe4GT5E9LC7f78UeR8GDJI2iNtBE%3D%40protonmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3364 bytes --]

Re: All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones

[fiddlosopher]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2691 bytes --]


It wasn't an intentional change, so please submit a bug report.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 5:42:55 AM UTC-7 Nick Bart wrote:

> I’m seeing this, too (using the most recent dev version), and agree in 
> preferring the ‘old’ behaviour.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 11:44 AM, Frederik Elwert <frederi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 
> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> when upgrading pandoc in our publication workflow (2.9→2.13), and thus 
> switching from pandoc-citeproc to citeproc, we noticed a change in 
> behaviour:
>
> We are converting all references authors send us to csl-yaml and embedd 
> them within the markdown file through the `references` metadata variable.
>
> Previously, only those entries that were actually cited also got printed 
> in the bibliography. That’s what we expected. Now, with citeproc, we find 
> that *all* entries from the `references` list are printed in the 
> bibliography. This is different from taking the same entries, putting them 
> in an external bibtex file, and include them with the `bibliography` 
> metadata key. If we do that, we get the old behaviour.
>
> So in sum, `references` now behaves like `bibliography` + `nocite: @*`.
>
> Is this the new intended behaviour, or is this a bug/regression?
>
> (For us, the older behaviour worked better, because often authors have 
> additional entries in their bibliography, against the guidelines. The old 
> behaviour made sure we only include those that are actually cited. Now we 
> have to check the references list manually.)
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Frederik
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/12103c9c-602d-4f60-b699-471dcbceb1dfn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/71de154c-86eb-440f-9abd-2b427a91fa99n%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3944 bytes --]

Re: All entries in `references` are listed in bibliography, not only the cited ones

['Nick Bart' via pandoc-discuss]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --]

Bug report at https://github.com/jgm/citeproc/issues/75.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/igyzxTkPTrdQvTN9x179ncFigC33QoVSr59QTU4xJRQrht_P7LZdzSx1pULr21b6g73wMW7BPBjjh9ftVVdr1z8NSAcqeOJ2AXf1kZTouv8%3D%40protonmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 966 bytes --]