Re: Pandoc stopped rendering tables and contents from the YAML block

[John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>]

You're not expected to create them.  Pandoc works fine without
them. But if you did have them, it could be implicitly using
a reference-doc defined there, so I wanted to rule that out.

Well, I can't reproduce your issue or think of anything that
could be causing it.

Please use pandoc --version and be sure you're running the
latest version (2.13).

Julio Vera <avenzecock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> I never created this folder ~/.pandoc or this one ~/.local/share/pandoc. I 
> made a quick google search and found that I was expected to create those 
> directories, I never found the guidelines in the documentation tho. So 
> answering your question, I don't have a reference.docx because I haven't 
> created those directories.
>
> thank you
>
> El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 16:16:27 UTC-5, John MacFarlane 
> escribió:
>
>>
>> Do you have a folder ~/.pandoc or ~/.local/share/pandoc that
>> contains reference.docx?
>>
>> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>> > Hi! I don't understand what about the "reference.docx", but in my folder 
>> > where I have the .md file I only have another .pdf file. 
>> >
>> > The command I use is: pandoc pxdxcomp.md -o pxdxcomp.docx
>> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 14:04:36 UTC-5, John MacFarlane 
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> >> Also, please let us know the full command you are using to
>> >> convert (including any options).
>> >>
>> >> John MacFarlane <j...-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Make sure you don't have a reference.docx in your user data
>> >> > directory.
>> >> >
>> >> > Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The latest one available in pandoc.org, I ran the script to 
>> uninstall 
>> >> it 
>> >> >> and then downloaded it again for macOS. 
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I tested again with this file (prueba.md) that I created just to see 
>> if 
>> >> it 
>> >> >> woks with new files but I got the same result.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [image: Captura de Pantalla 2021-05-27 a la(s) 12.54.14.png]
>> >> >> However, when I convert the dxprevcovid19.md to .docx the table 
>> there 
>> >> >> renders fine. 
>> >> >>
>> >> >> El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:49:09 UTC-5, John MacFarlane 
>> >> >> escribió:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> That's very strange -- it looks like it is using extremely narrow
>> >> >>> columns. But I can't reproduce this with latest pandoc. It
>> >> >>> looks fine. What version are you using?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > [image: Captura de Pantalla 2021-05-27 a la(s) 12.27.20.png]
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Corrected it, but the tables are still not rendering. That's how 
>> I 
>> >> see 
>> >> >>> the 
>> >> >>> > tables inside the docx just for that file (pxdxcomp.md), when I 
>> >> convert 
>> >> >>> it 
>> >> >>> > to pdf they render fine. 
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:17:28 UTC-5, John 
>> MacFarlane 
>> >> >>> > escribió:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Looks like you've got four ---- instead of three --- under the
>> >> >>> >> YAML metadata block.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> > Hi! 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > I attached 2 files. The one that I can't convert correctly is 
>> >> >>> >> pxdxcomp.md, 
>> >> >>> >> > the other one (dxprevcovid) I tried to convert it and had no 
>> >> issue. 
>> >> >>> The 
>> >> >>> >> > language of my work is in Spanish, I hope it isn't an issue 
>> here. 
>> >> I 
>> >> >>> >> tried 
>> >> >>> >> > copying everything and pasting it inside a new file but still 
>> >> have 
>> >> >>> the 
>> >> >>> >> same 
>> >> >>> >> > problem, also I uninstalled and installed pandoc.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 12:00:09 UTC-5, John 
>> >> MacFarlane 
>> >> >>> >> > escribió:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Not much we can do to help without seeing the input markdown 
>> >> file...
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Julio Vera <avenz...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> > I usually just ran the following command:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > pandoc nameofile.md --citeproc -o nameofile.docx
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > But today I was working with a particular .md file and 
>> after I 
>> >> >>> >> finished 
>> >> >>> >> >> > with it I tried to convert it, but the title, date and 
>> author 
>> >> >>> >> parameters 
>> >> >>> >> >> > that go inside the YAML block aren't converted, they 
>> display 
>> >> like 
>> >> >>> >> this:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > title: title of the document
>> >> >>> >> >> > author: myname
>> >> >>> >> >> > date: today
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > But just in that format, not like it used to do. And also 
>> the 
>> >> >>> tables 
>> >> >>> >> >> aren't 
>> >> >>> >> >> > formatted, they and up in the docs like this:
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > p t
>> >> >>> >> >> > r 2
>> >> >>> >> >> > 1 2
>> >> >>> >> >> > 2 2
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > Just to say an example. I don't know hat happened.
>> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >> > -- 
>> >> >>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> >> Google 
>> >> >>> >> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>> from 
>> >> it, 
>> >> >>> >> send 
>> >> >>> >> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> >> >>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> >>> >> >> 
>> >> >>> >> 
>> >> >>> 
>> >> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/1abeeca5-7362-441d-907a-08df53958b28n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> >> >> .
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > -- 
>> >> >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> >> Google 
>> >> >>> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>> it, 
>> >> >>> send 
>> >> >>> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> >> >>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> >>> >> 
>> >> >>> 
>> >> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/eaeda4d3-c7f4-430f-b569-e2fee781b831n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> >> .
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> > title: Diagnóstico situacional sobre la prevalencia de 
>> SARS-COV-2 
>> >> en 
>> >> >>> >> perros, gatos y hurones de propietarios previamente 
>> diagnósticados 
>> >> con 
>> >> >>> el 
>> >> >>> >> virus.
>> >> >>> >> > author: Julio Vera de León
>> >> >>> >> > date: 25/Mayo/2021
>> >> >>> >> > bibliography: proyecto.bib
>> >> >>> >> > csl: vca.csl
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Título
>> >> >>> >> > **H. CONSEJO TÉCNICO DE LA FACULTAD**
>> >> >>> >> > **DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA Y ZOOTECNIA**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > **Presente**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Él que suscribe, **Julio Vera de León**, alumnos de la 
>> Maestría 
>> >> en 
>> >> >>> >> Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia en el área de Salud Pública y 
>> >> Medicina 
>> >> >>> >> Preventiva, con número de cuenta 52101425-4. Pone a su 
>> >> consideración el 
>> >> >>> >> siguiente tema para diagnóstico de situación:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > **Diagnóstico situacional sobre la prevalencia de SARS-COV-2 
>> en 
>> >> >>> perros, 
>> >> >>> >> gatos y hurones de propietarios previamente diagnósticados con 
>> el 
>> >> >>> virus.**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Que será realizado en el **Departamento de Medicina Preventiva 
>> y 
>> >> >>> Salud 
>> >> >>> >> Pública de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia de la 
>> >> UNAM** 
>> >> >>> y 
>> >> >>> >> que pertenece al campo de profundización profesional: **Medicina 
>> >> >>> Preventiva 
>> >> >>> >> y Salud Pública**. Bajo la asesoría del comité tutor conformado 
>> por 
>> >> el 
>> >> >>> >> **Dr. MSP Juan Ramón Ayala Torres**, la **MCV. Patricia Mora 
>> >> Medina** y 
>> >> >>> el 
>> >> >>> >> **MCV. Jorge Francisco Monroy López**
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Introducción
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El sustento de este diagnóstico de situación viene de que a la 
>> >> fecha 
>> >> >>> es 
>> >> >>> >> desconocido por el autor algún material bibliográfico o de 
>> consulta 
>> >> en 
>> >> >>> el 
>> >> >>> >> que se tengan datos referentes al número de animales que han 
>> sido 
>> >> >>> >> infectados por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus 
>> 2 
>> >> >>> >> (SARS-COV-2). Esto a pesar de que la infección en los animales 
>> por 
>> >> >>> >> SARS-COV-2 cumple los criterios de la OIE como enfermedad 
>> >> emergente.[^1]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Es relevante tener datos que nos permitan conocer la 
>> prevalencia 
>> >> del 
>> >> >>> >> agente en los animales de compañía con los que mantenemos una 
>> >> relación 
>> >> >>> más 
>> >> >>> >> cercana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^1]: Enfermedad emergente por la OIE: La aparición de una 
>> >> >>> enfermedad, 
>> >> >>> >> infección o infestación nueva y que impacta en la sanidad animal 
>> o 
>> >> la 
>> >> >>> salud 
>> >> >>> >> humana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A la fecha existen al menos 4 distintas instituciones en 
>> América 
>> >> que 
>> >> >>> >> están realizando estudios de muestreo para conocer la cantidad 
>> de 
>> >> >>> animales 
>> >> >>> >> de compañia infectados por contacto con sus propietarios, las 
>> >> cuales 
>> >> >>> son:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. [Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph](
>> >> >>> >> https://ovc.uoguelph.ca)
>> >> >>> >> > 2. [Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts 
>> University](
>> >> >>> >> https://sites.tufts.edu/covers/)
>> >> >>> >> > 3. [Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary Medicine & 
>> >> Biomedical 
>> >> >>> >> Sciences](
>> https://vetmed.tamu.edu/hamer-lab/covid-19-pets-research/
>> >> )
>> >> >>> >> > 4. [University of Washington Center for One Health Research](
>> >> >>> >> https://deohs.washington.edu/cohr/covid-19-and-pets-study-caps)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La evidencia apunta a que la epidemia provocada por SARS-COV-2 
>> se 
>> >> >>> >> mantiene principalmente por la transmisión de humanos hacia 
>> otros 
>> >> >>> humanos, 
>> >> >>> >> por lo que en este estudio el enfoque será conocer la cantidad 
>> de 
>> >> >>> animales 
>> >> >>> >> que han sido infectados por sus propietarios, factores que 
>> >> >>> contribuyeron a 
>> >> >>> >> la infección, y conocer los tipos de casa en los que hubo más 
>> >> riesgo de 
>> >> >>> >> infección a las mascotas. Aunado a lo anterior, la OIE no 
>> descarta 
>> >> a 
>> >> >>> los 
>> >> >>> >> animales salvajes y domésticos como reservorios futuros de la 
>> >> >>> enfermedad y 
>> >> >>> >> que puedan representar un problema para la salud pública, por lo 
>> >> que 
>> >> >>> >> sugiere el monitoreo cercano de las especies con las que más 
>> >> >>> convivimos. De 
>> >> >>> >> igual forma, la introducción constante del virus a nuevas 
>> >> poblaciones 
>> >> >>> >> animales puede llevar a mutaciones que puedan afectar la sanidad 
>> >> animal 
>> >> >>> o 
>> >> >>> >> salud humana.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A la fecha la OIE cuenta con información referente a las 
>> especies 
>> >> de 
>> >> >>> >> interés en este diagnóstico en cuánto a la susceptibilidad que 
>> >> tienen 
>> >> >>> al 
>> >> >>> >> virus, se pone en la siguiente tabla:[@OIE2021]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Especie | Tipo de infección | Susceptibilidad a la infección 
>> | 
>> >> >>> Signos 
>> >> >>> >> clínicos | Transmisión |
>> >> >>> >> > | ------------------ | ---------------------- | 
>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------ | -------------------------- | 
>> >> >>> >> ----------------- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Hurones | Natural y experimental | Alta | Sí (sólo en 
>> algunos 
>> >> >>> casos) | 
>> >> >>> >> Sí, entre hurones |
>> >> >>> >> > | Gatos (domésticos) | Natural y experimental | Alta | Sí 
>> (sólo 
>> >> en 
>> >> >>> >> algunos casos) | Sí, entre gatos |
>> >> >>> >> > | Perros | Natural y experimental | Baja | Sí (sólo en algunos 
>> >> casos) 
>> >> >>> | 
>> >> >>> >> No |
>> >> >>> >> > Table: SARS-COV-2 en Hurones, perros y gatos (adaptado de la 
>> OIE)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > A pesar de que la información actual ha mencionado que la 
>> >> epidemia se 
>> >> >>> >> mantiene por medio de la transmisión humano-humano, no se puede 
>> >> >>> descartar 
>> >> >>> >> como un componente de esta cadena de transmisión a los animales 
>> de 
>> >> >>> >> compañia, aunque su papel de momento sea mucho menos relevante. 
>> De 
>> >> ahí 
>> >> >>> que 
>> >> >>> >> una de las indicaciones que contempla la CDC sea la de mantener 
>> a 
>> >> los 
>> >> >>> >> animales separados junto con su propietario y reconoce el riesgo 
>> de 
>> >> >>> >> transmisión desde la mascota es bajo. [@CDC2021]
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Justificación
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La detección del material genético del virus de SARS-COV-2 en 
>> >> perros 
>> >> >>> y 
>> >> >>> >> gatos se ha demostrado en animales con y sin signología, así 
>> como 
>> >> >>> también 
>> >> >>> >> en el suero de mascotas que se han muestreado en zonas 
>> afectadas, 
>> >> por 
>> >> >>> lo 
>> >> >>> >> que la infección en estas especies está comprobada, y más 
>> >> importante se 
>> >> >>> ha 
>> >> >>> >> comprobado que llegan a diseminar material viral con una 
>> cantidad 
>> >> >>> necesaria 
>> >> >>> >> que ha demostrado ser capaz de infectar a otros animales con los 
>> >> que 
>> >> >>> >> conviven. @Patterson2020
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > En contraste con lo mencionado anteriormente, las especies de 
>> >> >>> producción 
>> >> >>> >> como cerdos (*Sus scropha*) y aves (gallinas, patos y pavos) han 
>> >> >>> demostrado 
>> >> >>> >> de nula a extremadamente baja susceptiblidad de infección de 
>> manera 
>> >> >>> >> experimental, además de que no se ha comprobado sean capaces de 
>> >> >>> transmitir 
>> >> >>> >> la enfermedad. @Shi2020 De manera similar los bovinos (*Bos 
>> >> taurus*) 
>> >> >>> que se 
>> >> >>> >> han inoculado experimentalmente con el agente viral han 
>> demostrado 
>> >> una 
>> >> >>> >> susceptibilidad baja al agente y nula capacidad de transmisión 
>> del 
>> >> >>> mismo. 
>> >> >>> >> @Ulrich2020 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Debido a que las especies usadas comúnmente en la ganadería no 
>> >> han 
>> >> >>> >> demostrado ser suceptibles al virus, se decide enfocar el 
>> >> diagnístico 
>> >> >>> de 
>> >> >>> >> situación en perros, gatos y hurones. De estos tres es de 
>> >> particular 
>> >> >>> >> relevancia mencionar a los hurones domésticos (*Mustela outorius 
>> >> >>> furo*), ya 
>> >> >>> >> que pertenecen a la familia *Mustelidae* y guardan una relación 
>> >> >>> taxonómica 
>> >> >>> >> con los mustélidos usados en granjas como lo es el visón 
>> americano 
>> >> >>> >> (*Neovison vison*) y visón europeo (*Mustela lutreola*), estos 
>> >> últimos 
>> >> >>> >> responsables del brote de SARS-COV-2 que llevó a la eutanasia de 
>> 17 
>> >> >>> >> millones de visones.[^2] 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Aunque los hurones domésticos frecuentemente se encuentran 
>> >> separados 
>> >> >>> de 
>> >> >>> >> otros y no son capaces de mantener la propagación del virus de 
>> >> manera 
>> >> >>> >> estable @Gortazar2021, el gobierno del Reino Unido ha emitido 
>> una 
>> >> guía 
>> >> >>> >> especial para los dueños de estos animales debido al riesgo que 
>> >> pueden 
>> >> >>> >> representar [^3]. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^2]: [¿Por qué Dinamarca sacrificó 17 millones de visones?](
>> >> >>> >> 
>> >> >>> 
>> >> 
>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/animal-news/here-s-why-denmark-culled-17-million-minks-now-plans-n1249610
>> >> >>> >> )
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > [^3]: [Medidas preventivas en lo que respecta al SARS-COV-2 y 
>> los 
>> >> >>> >> hurones en el Reino Unido](
>> >> >>> >> 
>> http://apha.defra.gov.uk/documents/guidance-sars-cov-2-ferrets.pdf)
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Es así que en consideración al Código Sanitario para los 
>> Animales 
>> >> >>> >> Terrestres que contempla al SARS-COV-2 como una enfermedad 
>> >> emergente y 
>> >> >>> la 
>> >> >>> >> falta de datos al respecto de la enfermedad en los animales 
>> >> domésticos, 
>> >> >>> es 
>> >> >>> >> necesario realizar un diagnóstico de situación en nuestra 
>> >> población. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Referencias
>> >> >>> >> > ---
>> >> >>> >> > title: Ejercicio de pruebas diagnósticas complementarias
>> >> >>> >> > author: Julio Vera de León
>> >> >>> >> > date: 26/Mayo/2021
>> >> >>> >> > ----
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Primer prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La primer prueba tamiz que se usa para brucelosis es la de 
>> anillo 
>> >> en 
>> >> >>> >> leche. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Se hizo un diagnóstico con la prueba tamiz de anillo en leche 
>> >> para 
>> >> >>> >> detectar a los hatos positivos a la enfermedad, estos hatos 
>> cuentan 
>> >> con 
>> >> >>> >> 10.000 animales, los cuales fueron evaluados individualmente 
>> para 
>> >> >>> encontrar 
>> >> >>> >> los positivos; a través de la prueba tamiz de rosa de bengala la 
>> >> cual 
>> >> >>> tiene 
>> >> >>> >> una sensibilidad del 95.2% y una especificidad del 98.5%.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 286 | 145 | 431 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 14 | 9555 | 9569 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 300 | 9700 | 10000 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Sanos: 9555
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Enfermos postprueba: 286
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Falsos positivos: 145
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Falsos negativos: 14
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Valor predictivo positivo: 66%
>> >> >>> >> > 6. Valor predictivo negativo: 99%
>> >> >>> >> > 7. Positivos a la prueba: 431 animales positivos, incluyendo 
>> >> falsos 
>> >> >>> >> positivos. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Son muchos animales (431) que se van a eliminar incluyendo los 
>> >> 145 
>> >> >>> >> falsos positivos, sacrificando 145 animales que no deberían 
>> >> >>> sacrificarse, 
>> >> >>> >> por lo que es necesario después de la prueba tamiz realizar una 
>> >> prueba 
>> >> >>> >> mucho más especifica, por lo que se sugierte una prueba con mas 
>> >> >>> >> especificidad para bajar la cantidad de falsos positivos. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Segunda prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > La siguiente prueba se hace en paralelo, la norma dice que la 
>> >> segunda 
>> >> >>> >> prueba es la *prueba de ribanol*. Esta tiene una sensibilidad 
>> del 
>> >> 96.4% 
>> >> >>> y 
>> >> >>> >> especificidad de 98.7%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Cuadro de 2x2: 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 276 | 2 | 278 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 10 | 143 | 153 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 286 | 145 | 431 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. En que animales se aplicaría? Sobre el total de positivos, 
>> que 
>> >> >>> sería 
>> >> >>> >> 431
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Verdaderos positivos: 276
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Verdaderamente sanos: 143
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Falsos positivos: 2
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Falsos negativos: 10
>> >> >>> >> > 6. Valor predicitvo positivo: 99% 
>> >> >>> >> > 7. Valor predictivo negativo: 93%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > # Tercer prueba
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Al realizar un tercer diagnóstico con la prueba de fijación 
>> del 
>> >> >>> >> complemento (confirmatoria) con una sensibilidad del 97.5% y 
>> >> >>> especificidad 
>> >> >>> >> del 99%
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Cuadro 2 x2:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > | Prueba | Positivos | Negativos | Total |
>> >> >>> >> > | --------- | --------- | --------- | ----- |
>> >> >>> >> > | Positivos | 269 | 0 | 269 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Negativos | 7 | 2 | 9 |
>> >> >>> >> > | Total | 276 | 2 | 278 |
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Animales falsos positivos que seran eliminados: 0
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Animales falsos negativos que quedarán en el hato: 7
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Valor predictivo positivo: 100%. Quiere decir que de los 
>> >> animales 
>> >> >>> a 
>> >> >>> >> los que se les hace la prueba y están enfermos, el 100% saldrán 
>> con 
>> >> un 
>> >> >>> >> respultado positivo.
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Valor predictivo negativo: 22%. Quiere decir de los 
>> animales a 
>> >> los 
>> >> >>> >> que se les hace la prueba y están sanos, solamente el 22% tiene 
>> >> >>> >> probabilidad de estar realmente sano si salió negativo. 
>> >> >>> >> > 
>> >> >>> >> > # Después de las pruebas
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Al realizar un diagnóstico a los 6 meses de iniciado el 
>> programa:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. ¿Cuál es la prevalencia real final de la enfermedad en la 
>> >> cuenca 
>> >> >>> >> lechera? 2.8% (278/10000)
>> >> >>> >> > 2. La prevalencia real en el 3er cuadro: 99.3% 
>> >> >>> >> > 3. ¿Cuál es la prevalencia aparente en el 3er cuadro? 2.7% ()
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Repercusiones de dejar a los animales falsos negativos en 
>> el 
>> >> hato 
>> >> >>> es 
>> >> >>> >> que se quedan 7 animales con brucella, que pueden seguir 
>> >> contagiando y 
>> >> >>> >> prevalece la enfermedad. 
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > El costo de la prueba da anillo en leche es absorbido por el 
>> >> gobierno 
>> >> >>> >> como una ayuda a los productoras y un incentivo para erradicar 
>> esta 
>> >> >>> >> zoonosis de tos animales. Sin embargo, el costo de las demás 
>> >> pruebas es 
>> >> >>> >> erogado por los productores:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > 1. Costo de diagnosticar a los 10,000 animales con rosa de 
>> >> bengala 
>> >> >>> >> (anillo en leche), si esta prueba cuesta $0.15 por 100 animales: 
>> 15 
>> >> >>> pesos
>> >> >>> >> > 2. Costo de diagnosticar $1 por 100: serían $4.3
>> >> >>> >> > 3. Costo de diagnosticar fijación por complemento $500 por 100 
>> >> >>> animales: 
>> >> >>> >> $1390
>> >> >>> >> > 4. Costo de eliminar a los animales positivos y falsos 
>> positivos 
>> >> >>> >> (separadamente), si una vaquilla de reemplazo cuesta $1,000 
>> >> dolares. 
>> >> >>> Costo 
>> >> >>> >> de positivos: $278,000 dolares. 
>> >> >>> >> > 5. Costo total de las 3 pruebas y de los animales a 
>> sacrificar: 
>> >> De 
>> >> >>> las 3 
>> >> >>> >> pruebas son $1409.3 pesos. 
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > -- 
>> >> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> Google 
>> >> >>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> >> send 
>> >> >>> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> >> >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> >>> 
>> >> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/edd6a94c-a735-494d-88c5-bacabb6842b0n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> >>> .
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -- 
>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send 
>> >> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/932560f4-7866-4fd4-90e7-4797e23fab20n%40googlegroups.com
>> >> .
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Table tests to see if it works
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Another table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 2
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And another table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Perros | Talla | Peso | Nombre |
>> >> >> | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ |
>> >> >> | 23 | 5 | 6 | Chicu |
>> >> >> | 24 | 2 | 4 | Fala |
>> >> >> | 45 | 8 | 10 | Frty |
>> >> >> Table: Perros 3
>> >>
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to pandoc-discus...-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/ba007430-af22-455f-a4a8-96011afe5dc3n%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/74450a6b-43ad-4780-90d6-80f51c203f1fn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m24kemrfgu.fsf%40MacBook-Pro.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.