footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

[denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]

Hi,

consider this MWE:

```
Test.[^1]

Test![^2]

Test!^[asdf]

[^1]: asdf

[^2]: asdf
```

Running pandoc on this example gives me this error/warning:
[WARNING] Note with key '2' defined at exclamation-bug.md line 7 column 1 but not used.

I'm on pandoc 2.16.2

Is it possible that the exclamation mark breaks the footnote definition? An inline footnote works just fine here.

Denis

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/574ba8e2f7094f00b7c1c7c92264655d%40unibe.ch.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3582 bytes --]

Re: footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

[Bastien DUMONT]

In case it helps debugging, this problem does not appear with pandoc 2.14.1.

Le Wednesday 15 December 2021 à 08:55:55AM, denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> consider this MWE:
> 
>  
> 
> ```
> 
> Test.[^1]
> 
>  
> 
> Test![^2]
> 
>  
> 
> Test!^[asdf]
> 
>  
> 
> [^1]: asdf
> 
>  
> 
> [^2]: asdf
> 
> ```
> 
>  
> 
> Running pandoc on this example gives me this error/warning:
> 
> [WARNING] Note with key '2' defined at exclamation-bug.md line 7 column 1 but
> not used.
> 
>  
> 
> I’m on pandoc 2.16.2
> 
>  
> 
> Is it possible that the exclamation mark breaks the footnote definition? An
> inline footnote works just fine here.
> 
>  
> 
> Denis
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to [1]pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit [2]https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/
> pandoc-discuss/574ba8e2f7094f00b7c1c7c92264655d%40unibe.ch.
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] mailto:pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> [2] https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/574ba8e2f7094f00b7c1c7c92264655d%40unibe.ch?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/Ybm4jdGectM5s2S9%40localhost.

Re: footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

[jcr]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1203 bytes --]

I was bitten by this bug before you: 
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/7723. The fix should be in the next 
release of pandoc.

On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 9:56:00 AM UTC+1 denis...-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  
>
> consider this MWE: 
>
>  
>
> ```
>
> Test.[^1]
>
>  
>
> Test![^2]
>
>  
>
> Test!^[asdf]
>
>  
>
> [^1]: asdf
>
>  
>
> [^2]: asdf
>
> ```
>
>  
>
> Running pandoc on this example gives me this error/warning:
>
> [WARNING] Note with key '2' defined at exclamation-bug.md line 7 column 1 
> but not used.
>
>  
>
> I’m on pandoc 2.16.2
>
>  
>
> Is it possible that the exclamation mark breaks the footnote definition? 
> An inline footnote works just fine here.
>
>  
>
> Denis 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/48f6b6df-ab04-487b-8bdb-2a0e71cb75fdn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2844 bytes --]

Re: footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

[John MacFarlane]

This has already been fixed in master (bug #7723).

<denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> consider this MWE:
>
> ```
> Test.[^1]
>
> Test![^2]
>
> Test!^[asdf]
>
> [^1]: asdf
>
> [^2]: asdf
> ```
>
> Running pandoc on this example gives me this error/warning:
> [WARNING] Note with key '2' defined at exclamation-bug.md line 7 column 1 but not used.
>
> I'm on pandoc 2.16.2
>
> Is it possible that the exclamation mark breaks the footnote definition? An inline footnote works just fine here.
>
> Denis
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/574ba8e2f7094f00b7c1c7c92264655d%40unibe.ch.

AW: footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark

[denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0]

Great this is already fixed.
Thanks everyone for your help.

Denis

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 16:31
> An: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) <denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org>; pandoc-
> discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
> Betreff: Re: footnote definitons: bug (?) with exclamation mark
> 
> 
> This has already been fixed in master (bug #7723).
> 
> <denis.maier-NSENcxR/0n0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > consider this MWE:
> >
> > ```
> > Test.[^1]
> >
> > Test![^2]
> >
> > Test!^[asdf]
> >
> > [^1]: asdf
> >
> > [^2]: asdf
> > ```
> >
> > Running pandoc on this example gives me this error/warning:
> > [WARNING] Note with key '2' defined at exclamation-bug.md line 7 column
> 1 but not used.
> >
> > I'm on pandoc 2.16.2
> >
> > Is it possible that the exclamation mark breaks the footnote definition? An
> inline footnote works just fine here.
> >
> > Denis
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-
> discuss/574ba8e2f7094f00b7c1c7c92264655d%40unibe.ch.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/40ec6eb7f7514ca88a3777dc7eff7790%40unibe.ch.