Re: Could --biblatex use autocite instead of autocites so as to support numeric-comp style?

[jiewuza <jiewuza-9Onoh4P/yGk@public.gmane.org>]

But after all my efforts, I still cannot make autocites work as I want.


John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> writes:

> I'm reluctant to make that kind of change in the
> defaults.  But you can always create a custom template
> that imports biblatex with this option and redefines
> \autocites in a way that makes it behave like you want.
>
> jiewuza <jiewuza-9Onoh4P/yGk@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> Or is it possible to make autocites support numeric-comp?
>> So that we can get all the benefits.
>>
>> I found something at
>> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/114987/biblatex-supercite-with-square-brackets-and-grouped
>> but it is for supercite. 
>>
>> John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>
>>> I believe we use autocites because in principle each
>>> of the citations could have prefix, suffix, and
>>> locator, and this would be impossible to represent
>>> with autocite. Of course, in the case where there
>>> are no prefix, suffix, or locator, autocite could
>>> be used instead, and maybe it should.  Does anyone
>>> have opinions on this?
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to
>> pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To post to this group, send email to pandoc-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/m2d0sp9crm.fsf%40163.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.