Re: Proposed improvement to treat more images in docx

[John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>]

I can't think of any objections!

Milan Bracke <milan.bracke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Currently, when parsing a docx, a v:imagedata tag inside a 
> w:r/w:object/v:shape
> is ignored. But it could be treated the same as a v:imagedata inside a
> w:r/w:pict, both represent images linked by the r:id attribute.
>
> In fact, we now use a pre-processing to transform a
> w:r/w:object/v:shape/v:imagedata to a w:r/w:pict/v:imagedata before 
> transforming
> with Pandoc and we have tested this on many documents.
>
> So we would like to implement an improvement to treat both the same. Do you 
> have
> any objections or feedback? We'll make a pull request soon.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/f3fcee77-b7ea-4fe9-88ca-c4b22bab9d8an%40googlegroups.com.