Re: LaTeX end document / endinput compliance

[John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>]

Yes, you can submit a feature request.

A workaround could be using sed to remove everything from the
input document after \end{document} before passing it to pandoc.

Luis Rivera <jlrn77-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> So, there is no know workaround about this issue? May I submit a feature 
> request to the repo?
>
> Confused,
>
> On Saturday, 5 October 2019 12:37:43 UTC-5, Luis Rivera wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 4 October 2019 23:39:22 UTC-5, John MacFarlane wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity,  what do you have in your LaTeX document 
>>> after \end{document}? 
>>>
>>>
>> From the earliest days I put back there (as well as after \endinput) bits 
>> and pieces I don't want to discard, but don't make it to the final draft of 
>> the paper either. This way I don't clutter my directories with zettel, and 
>> I can find the discarded material for other purposes later. Then some 
>> people want opendoc/openxml copies for whatever reason, and then I found 
>> that the supposedly ignored materials pop up in the converted files.
>>
>> BTW I also miss the ability to comment out material with the {comment} 
>> environment: but then regular %s do the job. 
>>
>> Besides, the inability to handle materials this way with MarkDown is what 
>> keeps me from moving to that format altogether.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/881d31da-683e-456f-aa3d-b46ef5809ef1%40googlegroups.com.