Re: citeproc and "related" field

[John MacFarlane <jgm-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>]

The question is whether CSL has any variables corresponding to
these things.

http://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html#standard-variables

If so, we could try to be smarter about translating from
bibtex/biblatex to citeproc json.  If not, then it's out of scope
for pandoc-citeproc.

Guido Milanese <guido.milanese-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> I am seriously experimenting pandoc filter "citeproc" as an interesting 
> alternative to the workflow I am more used to, i.e. markdown to write and 
> then compilation -- through pandoc -- as LaTeX + biber + Biblatex. I 
> noticed that the filter supports the BibTeX "crossref" field (e.g. an 
> article published in a volume of Proceedings) but not the "related" fields, 
> such as "translationof", "multivolume" and the like. Is this feature 
> planned? This would be a great advantage for those who save data in BibTeX 
> format.
>
> Thank you. The pandoc "constellation" is incredibly useful and truly smart.
>
> guido (NW Italy)
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pandoc-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pandoc-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pandoc-discuss/6a9af74f-d011-4733-a984-7c8f460ee41c%40googlegroups.com.