From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nike.ins.cwru.edu ([129.22.8.219]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <25027>; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:32:06 -0500 Received: (chet@localhost) by nike.ins.cwru.edu (8.9.3/CWRU-2.5-bsdi) id QAA53644; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:34:31 -0500 (EST) (from chet) From: Chet Ramey To: haahr@jivetech.com Subject: Re: rc futures Cc: tjg@star.le.ac.uk, rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Reply-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu Message-ID: <1000112213339.AA53639.SM@nike.ins.cwru.edu> Read-Receipt-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-In-Reply-To: Message from haahr@jivetech.com of Fri, 31 Dec 1999 18:26:04 -0500 (id ) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:34:56 -0500 > Interesting. The docs for Plan 9 rc indicate that that's true, going > back to the version in the printed 10th edition manuals. As do sh and > its descendents, though not the csh family. According to Chet Ramey, > Posix mandates path searching for ``.'' in csh. I assume you mean `sh' here. POSIX.2, section 3.14.4. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet) Chet Ramey, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/