rc-list - mailing list for the rc(1) shell
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* $^t
@ 2001-09-03  9:20 Matt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-09-03  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rc

thanks ppl

my fault for not getting far enough down the man page to see the
INCOMPATIBILITES section. I didn't even envisage that there would be
any.

Kudos to Byron for the project at all but I would've thought that the
project goal was NO incompatibilites.

However now I've been enlightened to the parallel history I can see
that the user base albatross flaps it's wings.

Well it least I'm on the list now so I'll know about things in
advance.

Matt



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: $^t
  2001-09-04  4:16 ` $^t Callum Gibson
@ 2001-09-05  4:37   ` Paul Haahr
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Haahr @ 2001-09-05  4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rc

Callum Gibson wrote
> FWIW, I think $^t is more logical since it conserves special chars, even
> if it reverses the sense of the ^ operator.

I don't think it reverses the sense at all.  $^ was originally intended
to mean ``repeated application of the ^ operator on a variable.''

For what it's worth, that syntax in Byron's implementation appears to
date from early 1991:

  From: byron@archone.tamu.edu (Byron Rakitzis)
  To: haahr@adobe.com
  Subject: list flattening
  Date: Wed, 9 Jan 91 17:55:45 CST

  is now in as an operator. yip yip.

(I also have a drop of rc from half an hour before that message which
doesn't include $^, so we can be fairly precise about its timing.)

--p


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: $^t
  2001-09-04  2:43 $^t Byron Rakitzis
@ 2001-09-04  4:16 ` Callum Gibson
  2001-09-05  4:37   ` $^t Paul Haahr
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Callum Gibson @ 2001-09-04  4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rc

byron@rakitzis.com writes:
}That being said now that Plan 9 is more open perhaps the more
}superficial incompatabilities should be normalized, if possible.

FWIW, I think $^t is more logical since it conserves special chars, even
if it reverses the sense of the ^ operator.

(c)2001 Callum Gibson                       callum.gibson@db.com
Global Markets IT, Deutsche Bank, Australia       61 2 9258 1620
### The opinions in this message are mine and not Deutsche's ###


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: $^t
@ 2001-09-04  2:43 Byron Rakitzis
  2001-09-04  4:16 ` $^t Callum Gibson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Byron Rakitzis @ 2001-09-04  2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: matt; +Cc: rc

> thanks ppl
>
> my fault for not getting far enough down the man page to see the
> INCOMPATIBILITES section. I didn't even envisage that there would be
> any.
>
> Kudos to Byron for the project at all but I would've thought that the
> project goal was NO incompatibilites.

Well, it started out that way but in 1990 plan 9 was a closed system
and I didn't see any problem with fixing some of the glaring flaws
(I think "if not" falls in that category. However, on the subject of
"if not", at this point if anyone could hack it into the grammar and
still make the current behavior of "else" work I think that would be
a good thing).

Furthermore Unix != Plan 9 so I had to take the initiative on some
matters to make the shell work properly under Unix.

That being said now that Plan 9 is more open perhaps the more
superficial incompatabilities should be normalized, if possible.

Byron.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-05 23:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-03  9:20 $^t Matt
2001-09-04  2:43 $^t Byron Rakitzis
2001-09-04  4:16 ` $^t Callum Gibson
2001-09-05  4:37   ` $^t Paul Haahr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).