From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from merlin.resmel.bhp.com.au ([134.18.1.6]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2701>; Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:09:09 -0500 Received: from cerberus.bhpese.oz.au by merlin.resmel.bhp.com.au with SMTP id AA19365 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:08:15 +1100 Received: from localhost by cerberus.bhpese.oz.au with SMTP id AA29892; Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:08:25 +1100; sendmail 5.67a/Sm3.5RMSU (from Sm@cerberus.bhpese.oz.au for rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu) Message-Id: <199212180308.AA29892@cerberus.bhpese.oz.au> To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: Re: Here documents In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Dec 92 13:29:03 EST." <9212171829.AA21554@oldp.astro.wisc.edu> X-Face: '82~l%BnDBWVn])DV^cl_%bla$T]kNbRN&]>v{ED9[" I expect here documents to be part of the shell syntax stream, rather than part of the shell data stream. Thus it did not occur to me that something like the following would be even conceivable: { echo ...; echo ...; echo EOF } | cat << EOF as for multiple redirection in the same command, this doesn't bother me as long as it is done left->right. So I should be able to do cmd >file1 >[9=1] >[1=2] Sm