From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mod.civil.su.OZ.AU ([129.78.142.6]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <2706>; Sat, 29 May 1993 08:41:39 -0400 Received: by mod.civil.su.oz.au id <28692>; Sat, 29 May 1993 22:41:18 +1000 From: John (Most modern computers would break if you stood on them) Mackin Date: Sat, 29 May 1993 08:34:45 -0400 To: The rc Mailing List Subject: Re: Differences between Duff's rc and Byron's In-Reply-To: <93May26.141334edt.2729@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu> Message-ID: <199305292234.19589.rc.bakad@civil.su.oz.au> X-Face: 39seV7n\`#asqOFdx#oj/Uz*lseO_1n9n7rQS;~ve\e`&Z},nU1+>0X^>mg&M.^X$[ez>{F k5[Ah<7xBWF-@-ru?& @4K4-b`ydd^`(n%Z{ Chris wrote: Tom Duff's rc has history, done via a file named in $history. It's not documented, but it's there. I assume the basis for this statement is the set of early Duff sources that Chris has. I heard a rumour from the Plan 9 crowd over at Basser that $history had actually been _removed_ from rc since no one on Plan 9 used it; it seemed they found the 8 1/2 window program provided all the history they could want. I just this minute checked this -- I have no access to earlier Plan 9 sources, just the second (current) distribution, but I am certain that Chris's statement used to be correct, i.e. Duff's rc used to have $history. But as I said, I just now looked, and the rumour is true -- the one in the current Plan 9 CD doesn't have $history at all. To forestall possible misinterpretation, this is NOT a suggestion that $history should be removed from Byron's rc. `Just the facts.' OK, John.