Re: RC => POSIX

[Tom Culliton <culliton@clark.net>]

> What if we wrote rc to posix (or UNIX(tm) if posix isn't enough) and
> removed as much of the #ifdef's as possible. Then, on systems without
> posix support, we could  create a posix library for that operating
> system. Only covering the missing posix calls that rc uses, ofcourse.
>
> Has this kind of thing been done before and failed?
> Comments/Suggestions/xxx.

The problem is harder than that in rc's case.  Signal semantics make a
good example.  To be really posixy you'd use sigaction(), and while
you can write signal() in terms of sigaction, the reverse is not very
doable.  The differences between BSD and SysV signal semantics are one
of the reasons that RC has a bunch of #if's.  Others include optional
features such as readline, nonstandard OS features that make something
work in a better, safer way when they're present such as /dev/fd and
kernel recognition of "#!" in executable scrpts.  All your proposal
would do is move the #if's into the compatibility library.

BTW - While I'm thinking of it has anyone looked at how much effort it
would take to make the /dev/fd code work with a /proc file system?  I
mean without putting symbolic links in /dev.  Actually if that works,
as someone suggested, it seems like the code change should be easy...

Tom