From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from loas.clark.net ([168.143.0.13]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24674>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 19:24:27 -0500
Received: from shell.clark.net (root@shell [168.143.0.8])
	by loas.clark.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01935;
	Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:26:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell.clark.net (culliton@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.clark.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA10989; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:26:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199802102326.SAA10989@shell.clark.net>
To:	broman@nosc.mil
cc:	rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: "rc" shell maintainer? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Feb 1998 18:45:04 EST."
             <19980209234504.4267.qmail@np.nosc.mil> 
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:26:40 -0500
From:	Tom Culliton <culliton@clark.net>

On Mon, 09 Feb 1998 18:45:04 EST, Vincent Broman wrote:
> My rc-1.5b2 fails to trip because of the line testing
> 
>     prompt=';' if (!~ `` '' {. -i /tmp/dot.$pid>[2=1]} ';hi'^$nl';')
> 
> It seems that '. -i' used to output prompts, but in 1.5b2 it does not.
> Was this change unintentional?  I'd be uneasy about changing
> trip.rc to match spec "improvements".

Hmmm... This sounds familiar, are you building with GNU Readline?  Now
all I have to do is remember what I did to fix it... 8-/

I probably posted a patch...  Aha...  Yes I did, but Tim never picked
it up.  Look back through the archives for a message from me which
moves print_prompt2 from lex.c to input.c amoung other things.  I sent
it before my big signal handling fix.