From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw.softwell.se ([193.15.236.45]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <25129>; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 01:57:47 -0500 Received: from trillian.softwell.se (IDENT:bengt@trillian.softwell.se [192.42.172.11]) by fw.softwell.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09197 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:13:37 +0100 Received: (from bengt@localhost) by trillian.softwell.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA05638 for rc@hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:13:37 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:13:37 -0500 From: Bengt Kleberg Message-Id: <199912081513.QAA05638@trillian.softwell.se> To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca Subject: what if?, suggestion to re-instate the alternative if not syntax... Would it be possible to re-instate if not, ie the weird way of writing } else { that was around in rc in the very beginning? (and still is in Plan9 rc). I ahve a very rare wish to run Plan9 rc scripts using Byrons rc. this is seldom, but if it is possible/not difficult or so, I would like suggest it. any comments? Best Wishes, Bengt =============================================================== Everything aforementioned should be regarded as totally private opinions, and nothing else. bengt@softwell.se ``His great strength is that he is uncompromising. It would make him physically ill to think of programming in C++.''