From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from newton.hartwick.edu ([147.205.85.10]) by hawkwind.utcs.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <24774>; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 16:21:36 -0500 Received: from c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com (147.205.108.160 [147.205.108.160]) by newton.hartwick.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id X52J4PZY; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:59:58 -0500 Received: by c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:59:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:59:24 -0500 From: Decklin Foster To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: Re: rc error messages from scripts Message-ID: <19991209085924.A1882@debian> References: <199912090829.AAA23488@peanut.rakitzis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i In-Reply-To: <199912090829.AAA23488@peanut.rakitzis.com>; from byron@rakitzis.com on Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 12:29:59AM -0800 Byron Rakitzis writes: > Also: in general, child processes in the foreground do not need to be > identified by their pid. It's redundant. Ah. silly me. How about changing the other messages and leaving 'segmentation fault' as a special case (ie, no argv[0])? would you welcome such a patch? -- Decklin Written with Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org/