From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from waltz.mi.linux.it ([195.212.120.10]) by hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <26092>; Sat, 6 May 2000 17:41:16 -0400 Received: from ip-2nd.mi.linux.it (localhost) [195.212.120.11] (mail) by waltz.mi.linux.it with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 12o5CB-0006gA-00 (Debian); Sat, 6 May 2000 16:04:39 +0200 Received: from carlos by localhost with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12o1pE-0003bV-00; Sat, 6 May 2000 12:28:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 06:28:44 -0400 From: Carlo Strozzi To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu Subject: Re: building rc on QNX4 Message-ID: <20000506122844.A13794@tango.texne.com> Reply-To: carlos@texne.com Mail-Followup-To: rc@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu References: <200005040845.BAA09376@rakitzis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200005040845.BAA09376@rakitzis.com>; from byron@rakitzis.com on Thu, May 04, 2000 at 04:45:52AM -0400 Organization: TeXne.COM On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 04:45:52AM -0400, Byron Rakitzis wrote: >> to rc with a longer and more meaningful name, like 'rcsh'. > >I guess I can't shut up -- "rcsh" seems like an abominable name. > >rc has nothing to do with csh or any of the {tzck}sh family. > >We may as well call it "rash". Well, why not :-). Even calling it by it's name, that is Rc, would be reasonable. The mixed-casing would make it unique enough. --carlo -- I can read MIME or uuencoded e-mail attachments in PDF, Postscript, HTML, RTF or text formats. Please do not send Word or Excel files.